Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 → 26 of 40
3 categories · Named, not rankedModern Hire
12Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Modern Hire was named 5 times in Video interviewing and 2 other categories, where Spark Hire led with 50%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 42
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market56 of 66
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 40
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Modern Hire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 56 of 66 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 50% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 80 of 90 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 105 of 114 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Modern Hire held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Video interviewing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 20 → 54 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 8 → 9 of 38
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video interviewing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 56 of 66 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 90, unchanged |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 105 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Modern Hire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Modern Hire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose ModernHire if you are a tech-forward company prioritizing branding.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ModernHire, now owned by HireVue, falls into this category. Why to Avoid: These formats often feel gimmicky” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Modern Hire has been cited in independent bias studies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“If you are a brand new startup with no hiring history, Modern Hire is hard to use” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Modern Hire, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Modern Hire was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Modern Hire, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Modern Hire was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Modern Hire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 12 answers that named Modern Hire and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hirevire.com7
willo.video7
resources.rework.com6
hackerearth.com5
pin.com5
g2.com4
sparkhire.com4
guideflow.com3
hiretruffle.com3
hirevue.comYour site3
Forty-four of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Modern Hire came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hirevue.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Modern Hire takes 0% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hirevue.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Modern Hire takes 0% of first choices and Spark Hire takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video interviewing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “video interviewing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“modern hire”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 26 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 35,611 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,922 · 406 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,875
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 8 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 66 in video interviewing
Segment leader
50%
Spark Hire
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hirevue.com
1,156
subdomains included
Content
1,044
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
34 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 579 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | Video interviewing, Applicant tracking syste | |
| Podcast or video | 123 | 0 | 2026-01-30 | Video interviewing | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 96 | 3 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 81 | 0 | 2026-04-23 | Video interviewing | |
| Case study | 74 | 32 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| News or press | 63 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 15 | 0 | 2024-04-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2023-05-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-07-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16How nestle and hirevue are transforming early careers ta blog
- 2026-09-09Deloitte case study
- 2026-09-09Abf freight systems case study
- 2026-09-09Virgin australia case study
- 2026-09-09Heathrow case study
- 2026-09-09Chevron federal credit union case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hirevue.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Modern Hire
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Modern Hire; a claim can dispute any of them.
ModernHire 2
Follow Modern Hire
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Modern Hire is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Modern Hire is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Integrations claimed
- 45 hirevue.com
- Certifications
- SOCISOFedRampSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001:2013FedRAMP CertifiedISCO/IEC 270012013
- Customers named
- IkeaNestleSwire Coca-ColaEmiratesGreat Southern BankMitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking CorporationBBCSpectrum
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Modern Hire's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hirevue.com, hirevue.com/pricing, trust.hirevue.com, hirevue.com/platform, hirevue.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Modern Hire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Modern Hire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Modern Hire by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Modern Hire is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Modern Hire, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.