Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 of 97, unchanged
LinkedIn · 3 categories · RankedLinkedIn Talent Solutions
43Judge labels
1First choices
18Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Recruitment marketing for small business buyers
Rank 17 of 111 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business55 of 102
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 111
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise20 of 92
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LinkedIn Talent Solutions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 2% | 17 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 98 of 104 | 50% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 77 of 127 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Skills Base at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LinkedIn Talent Solutions held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Job advertising · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 64 → 16 of 103
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 → 18 of 89
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job advertising | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 64 → 17 of 111 |
| Recruitment marketing | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 98 of 104 |
| Skills intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 77 of 127, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LinkedIn Talent Solutions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LinkedIn Talent Solutions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend starting with Appcast or LinkedIn” MiniMax M2.5 · Job advertising · direct prompt · first choice
“combining free tools like a LinkedIn page, Canva for design, Buffer for scheduling, and Google Analytics” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“• Expensive, especially for small companies<br>• Complex setup process<br>• High advertising costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“reviews frequently note high cost, which makes it harder to justify for smaller companies” GPT-5.4 mini · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · soft negative
“Very expensive — particularly a pain point for small companies due to high advertising costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Expensive, particularly for small-to-mid-sized companies... hard to justify the ROI” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Talent Solutions, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Talent Solutions was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Talent Solutions, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Talent Solutions was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn Talent Solutions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 43 answers that named LinkedIn Talent Solutions and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com32
selectsoftwarereviews.com23
sprad.io18
hrtechsaas.com15
learn.g2.com15
pin.com15
resources.rework.com11
recruiterflow.com9
capterra.com8
jugglehire.com8
154 of the 154 domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn Talent Solutions came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where LinkedIn Talent Solutions stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where LinkedIn Talent Solutions stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“linkedin talent solutions”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on LinkedIn's site (linkedin.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 17 of 111 in job advertising
Segment leader
23%
JobTarget
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 43 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LinkedIn Talent Solutions; a claim can dispute any of them.
LinkedIn 3LinkedIn Recruitment Marketing 3LinkedIn (Basic) 1LinkedIn Recruitment Marketing / Recruiter 1
Follow LinkedIn Talent Solutions
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LinkedIn is the company behind LinkedIn Talent Solutions.ShowHide
The company
LinkedIn is the company behind LinkedIn Talent Solutions.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from LinkedIn
- LinkedIn "Easy Apply", LinkedIn Ads, LinkedIn Assessments, LinkedIn Company Page, LinkedIn Hiring Assistant, LinkedIn Job Slots, LinkedIn Jobs, LinkedIn Learning and 9 more
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn Talent Solutions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LinkedIn Talent Solutions by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LinkedIn Talent Solutions is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LinkedIn Talent Solutions, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.