Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 29 → 92 of 100
Lattice · 2 categories · RankedLattice Compensate
30Judge labels
1First choices
16Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Compensation management for small business buyers
Rank 33 of 140 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business106 of 108
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market33 of 140
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lattice Compensate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 33 of 140 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 25 of 73 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 12% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lattice Compensate held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 47 → 30 of 131
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 33 of 140 |
| Pay equity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 73, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lattice Compensate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lattice Compensate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Lattice is unbeatable if you want merit increases directly tied to performance ratings” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Others (like PayAnalytics, Figures, Lattice) explicitly target your size range.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · scale prompt · alternative
“Only makes sense if you're already in the Lattice ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative
“Lattice Compensate is seamless if you already use Lattice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Starts at ~$6/user/month but with a $4,000+ annual minimum—only viable if you already use Lattice Performance” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compensation management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lattice Compensate, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lattice Compensate was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lattice Compensate, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lattice Compensate was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lattice Compensate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 30 answers that named Lattice Compensate and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app20
peoplemanagingpeople.com17
ravio.com16
learn.g2.com15
sourceforge.net14
effy.ai11
g2.com11
compensationtools.net10
comprehensive.io10
figures.hr10
134 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming Lattice Compensate came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lattice.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lattice Compensate takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lattice.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lattice Compensate takes 0% of first choices and Pave takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “compensation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “compensation management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“lattice compensate”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- lattice.com shared with Lattice's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 122,123 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,750 · 1,242 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,061
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 38 clicks and $1,328 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 33 of 140 in compensation management
Segment leader
18%
Pave
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Lattice Compensate
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lattice Compensate; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lattice 2Lattice (Compensation Add-on) 1
Follow Lattice Compensate
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lattice is the company behind Lattice Compensate.ShowHide
The company
Lattice is the company behind Lattice Compensate.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Lattice
- Lattice, Lattice Analytics, Lattice Compensation
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Strategic pay that aligns to your budget
- For
- qualified nonprofits
- Price stated
- 20% discount lattice.com/lattice-for-good
- Customers named
- World Central Kitchen
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Lattice Compensate's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lattice.com/why-lattice, lattice.com/lattice-events, lattice.com/lattice-for-good, lattice.com/lattice-in-the-news, lattice.com/lattice-business-case. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lattice Compensate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lattice Compensate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lattice Compensate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lattice Compensate is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lattice Compensate, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.