HR AI Index

Index › Products › Jobilla · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Jobilla

13Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jobilla was named 6 times in Recruitment marketing, where Teamtailor led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business37 of 99

under the label threshold

Mid-market104 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise77 of 78

under the label threshold

In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Jobilla for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	104 of 104	83%	6	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 23%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Jobilla held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Recruitment marketing · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 35 of 91, unchanged

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 49 → 94 of 94

EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 69 of 73, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Recruitment marketing	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 49 → 104 of 104

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Jobilla across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Jobilla is among the second most reviewed platforms with a strong SMB and mid-market reviewer base” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“recruitment marketing platforms that you should be cautious about or avoid: 1. Jobilla - Users report issues with the candidate management system” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“Jobilla | • Emails frequently go to spam<br>• Mobile limitations hinder usability<br>• Difficult navigation requiring excessive clicks” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“Emails frequently landing in spam, significant mobile limitations, and difficult navigation” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

“Emails often going to spam, complicating candidate communication” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jobilla, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jobilla was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Teamtailor7 of 131Not among the top eight

LinkedIn Talent Solutions6 of 130Not among the top eight

Zoho Recruit5 of 132Not among the top eight

Bullhorn5 of 130Not among the top eight

Greenhouse4 of 131Not among the top eight

Appcast4 of 130Not among the top eight

Indeed4 of 130Not among the top eight

Joveo4 of 130Not among the top eight

iCIMS Attract4 of 130Not among the top eight

Workable3 of 131Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jobilla. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Jobilla and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com13

sprad.io9

hrtechsaas.com6

learn.g2.com5

rfp.wiki5

selectsoftwarereviews.com5

capterra.com4

webtonic.io4

whileresume.com4

findstack.com3

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Jobilla came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing12

sprad.io/provider-categories/recruitment-marketing9

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms6

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms4

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software4

webtonic.io/blog/best-hr-recruitment-marketing-tools4

whileresume.com/article/evaluate-the-online-recruitment4

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing/small-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jobilla.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jobilla takes 0% of first choices and Teamtailor takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “recruitment marketing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “recruitment marketing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“jobilla”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 9 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 22 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,237
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 104 of 104 in recruitment marketing

Segment leader

23%

Teamtailor

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 13 answers
Its own site cited: in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on jobilla.com

447

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	35	0	2024-04-17	Recruitment marketing
News or press	13	0	2023-01-04
Glossary or explainer	1	undated

Most recent

2024-04-17Finanzen controlling amp accounting blog
2023-01-04Joonas rajamaki is jobillas new chief financial officer news or press
2022-12-15Jobilla merges with its partner in the netherlands news or press
2022-11-28Jobilla germany launches its first edu event in berlin news or press
2022-05-24Jobilla is growth company of the year 2022 for the fourth consecutive year news or press
2022-03-25The silicon review lists jobilla among top pioneers worldwide news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page jobilla.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Jobilla

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jobilla; a claim can dispute any of them.

JobDiva/Jobilla 1

Follow Jobilla

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Jobilla is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered hiring, simplified.
jobilla.com
For: Employers and staffing agencies
jobilla.com
Certifications: GDPR compliantEU AI Act compliant
Customers named: SuuntoPonsseStockmann
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Jobilla's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: jobilla.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jobilla's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jobilla, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jobilla by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Jobilla is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jobilla, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.