Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 38 → 40 of 58
3 categories · Named, not rankedJira
14Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jira was named 7 times in Goals and OKRs and 2 other categories, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business32 of 63
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market64 of 68
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise37 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Jira for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 64 of 68 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 86 of 108 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 89 of 95 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Jira held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 43 → 58 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 47 → 31 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 64 of 68 |
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 84 → 86 of 108 |
| Leave | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Jira across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Jira across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“tools like Trello, Asana, Jira, Monday.com, or ClickUp to manage leave, but these should generally be avoided” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Leave · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid using these as your *primary* home for OKR tracking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
“standard, unpartitioned Jira or standard ServiceNow tickets ... Why to be cautious: ... HR service tickets frequently contain highly sensitive Personal Identifiable Information (PII)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR help desk · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with: PM tools (Asana, ClickUp, Jira)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jira, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jira, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jira. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 14 answers that named Jira and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com6
mooncamp.com5
okrstool.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
tability.io5
g2.com4
gartner.com4
capterra.com3
cascade.app3
profit.co3
Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Jira came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on jira.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
5,258
counted in the table below
Documentation
18
Product · Integration
107 · 65
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 4,109 | 0 | 2016-08-11 | Employee onboarding, Workforce planning | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 319 | 0 | 2016-08-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 285 | 0 | 2025-08-18 | Employee onboarding | |
| Report or ebook | 252 | 0 | 2024-01-03 | Employee onboarding, Performance management | |
| Case study | 93 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 84 | 0 | 2026-02-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 61 | 0 | 2016-08-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 34 | 0 | 2024-01-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | 5 | 2026-10-02 | ||
| News or press | 7 | 0 | 2022-03-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-02Atlassians chief product ai officer on why your pm job just expanded podcast or video
- 2026-09-16Why founders pivot and why you should too podcast or video
- 2026-09-09Atlassian's Chief AI Officer on building products for humans and agents - Inside Atlassian podcast or video
- 2026-08-11How kfc uses ai agents to ship software faster podcast or video
- 2026-07-20How Atlassian leaders are building a culture of AI-fluent teams - Inside Atlassian podcast or video
- 2026-06-18Atlassians hr team leads ai transformation podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page jira.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Jira
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jira's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jira, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jira by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Jira is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jira, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.