Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 18 of 88
11 categories · RankedMonday.com
76Judge labels
3First choices
18Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
11Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Goals and OKRs for small business buyers
Rank 14 of 93 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 91
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 93
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Monday.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 2% | 14 of 93 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 59 of 68 | 44% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 66 of 95 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Employee monitoring | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 42 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33% | |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 83 of 87 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 43 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 26% | |
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 67 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Teams at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 73 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 91 of 95 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 44 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 73 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Monday.com held within the floor in all eleven categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Succession planning · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 → 12 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 14 of 93 |
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 50 → 59 of 68 |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 66 of 95, unchanged |
| Employee monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 75, unchanged |
| Employee onboarding | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 103 → 83 of 87 |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 66, unchanged |
| Internal communications | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 67 of 86, unchanged |
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 57 → 73 of 102 |
| Leave | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 91 of 95, unchanged |
| Time and attendance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 60 → 44 of 86 |
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 73 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Monday.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Monday.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase16 labels1
Comparative13 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels2
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative19 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“start with Teamflect (free tier) or monday.com (free plan)” Mistral Small · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice
“Offers a central system to monitor candidate progression, track milestones, and view development journeys.” Llama 4 Maverick · Succession planning · budget prompt · alternative
“Monday is highly customizable via a visual drag-and-drop builder... requires some initial setup” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · comparative prompt · alternative
“monday.com is notable for cross-department alignment and adaptable goal architecture” Perplexity Sonar · Goals and OKRs · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"You tracked your key results in Monday.com. You still missed your quarterly goals." ... "These tools were never made to help you achieve goals."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools like Trello, Asana, Jira, Monday.com, or ClickUp to manage leave, but these should generally be avoided” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Leave · negative prompt · hard negative
“these become unmanageable quickly... lack the automated legal compliance tracking of dedicated software” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid using these as your *primary* home for OKR tracking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Monday.com, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Monday.com was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Monday.com, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Monday.com was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Monday.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 76 answers that named Monday.com and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
monday.comYour site29
peoplemanagingpeople.com21
g2.com15
firsthr.app14
tability.io14
okrstool.com13
engagedly.com11
mooncamp.com10
workhuman.com10
capterra.com9
117 of the 146 domain citations in answers naming Monday.com came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
monday.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Monday.com takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
monday.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Monday.com takes 2% of first choices and Lattice takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “succession planning tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “succession planning software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 74,000 a month (“monday.com”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3,467 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 691,961 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 66,810 · 3,856 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 73,994
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 26 clicks and $164 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 93 in succession planning
Segment leader
28%
Lattice
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 76 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 57 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on monday.com
11,054
subdomains included
Content
3,300
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,905
Product · Integration
97 · 30
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,598 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 189 | 0 | 2026-02-18 | ||
| Comparison | 169 | 5 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 138 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| News or press | 61 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 53 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 51 | 5 | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 32 | 1 | 2026-07-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Hitachi construction machinery case study
- 2026-09-15What is the primary treatment modality of modafinil 200 mg tablets o9NvYpAw1fo7jWk glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-04Case study from scattered leads to a connected fulfillment pipeline yb4ufnNyp201397 case study
- 2026-09-03What is agentic ai crm glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-31Lovable alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-24Food folk case study
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 28, 2026Elevate 2026: NYCJavits Center, New York, USA · hosts
- November 24, 2026Elevate 2026: EMEAExcel London - Royal Victoria Dock, 1 Western Gateway, London E16 1XL, UK, London, UK · hosts
Last twelve months
- November 6, 2025Elevate 2025Sydney · took part
- October 22, 2025 to October 23, 2025Elevate 2025London · took part
As the event pages on monday.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page monday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Monday.com
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Monday.com; a claim can dispute any of them.
monday.com 9
Follow Monday.com
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Monday.com is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Monday.com is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI Work Platform for People & Agents
- For
- People and agents
- Price stated
- Plans start from 3 users. If you want to sign up more than 40 users, you can request a quote to get an exact price. monday.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 monday.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- No credit card needed; Unlimited time on Free plan monday.com
- Integrations claimed
- 250 monday.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPRISOAICPA SOCHIPAAISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27018SOC 2SOC 1
- Hosting
- Worldwide
- Customers named
- McDonald’sCanvaVMLMotorolaMcDonald'sCarrefourCoca-ColaLions Gate
What Monday.com's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: monday.com, monday.com/pricing, trust.monday.com, monday.com/features/files, monday.com/w/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Monday.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Monday.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Monday.com by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Monday.com is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Monday.com, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.