Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 16 of 104
1 category · RankedGenially
14Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Course authoring tools for small business buyers
Rank 30 of 82 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 112
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market30 of 82
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Genially for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 0% | 30 of 82 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Genially held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Course authoring tools · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 31 → 29 of 76
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 30 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Genially across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Genially across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best if you want a free-tier web tool: Genially or Adapt Learning are cited as budget-conscious options” Perplexity Sonar · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · alternative
“Genially (The Visual Engagement Choice) Best for: Marketing-style presentations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Visuals and Gamification... paid plans... start at a fraction of the cost” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Treat these cautiously for full course authoring” Perplexity Sonar · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Genially, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Genially was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Genially, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Genially was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Genially. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 14 answers that named Genially and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
elearningindustry.com8
easygenerator.com7
intellum.com6
elearning.adobe.com5
ispringsolutions.com5
pcmag.com5
synthesia.io5
capterra.com4
colossyan.com4
guideflow.com4
Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Genially came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
genially.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Genially takes 0% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
genially.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Genially takes 0% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “authoring tools”
8
Position for “elearning authoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 33,100 a month (“genially”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,223 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 250,555 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 52,381 · 1,615 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 53,219
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 30 of 82 in course authoring tools
Segment leader
30%
Articulate 360
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on genially.com
10,634
subdomains included
Content
1,831
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
20 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 1,444 | 0 | 2025-10-08 | Employee onboarding | |
| Blog | 340 | 7 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Case study | 20 | 3 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2025-06-20 | Course authoring tools | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-19Meaningful learning blog
- 2026-08-19Ibw higher technical college case study
- 2026-08-18Future of learning blog
- 2026-08-07Ia para preparar clases blog
- 2026-08-07Teaching instructional design for the real world blog
- 2026-08-07Ai for lesson planning blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page genially.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Genially
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Genially is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Genially is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered interactive content platform
- For
- organizations and educators
- Price stated
- Free genially.com
- Starting price
- Free genially.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start now, it's free genially.com
- Certifications
- GDPRSOC 2RGPD compliantFERPA compliantCOPPA compliantSOC 2 CertifiedCompliance with WCAG 2.0 standard Level AAAWS Foundational Technical Review
- Hosting
- EU
- Customers named
- E.ON NextibWUniversidad San Buenaventurabbw GroupFrancisco de Vitoria UniversitySan José Jesuit CollegeHighlands School Los FresnosHolcim
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Genially's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: genially.com, genially.com/plans, trust.genially.com, genially.com/features, genially.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Genially's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Genially, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Genially by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Genially is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Genially, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.