Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 2 of 104
1 category · RankedEasygenerator
93Judge labels
18First choices
1Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Course authoring tools for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 82 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Easygenerator →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business3 of 112
11%28 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 82
2%30 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 96
18%35 labels
accepted challenger
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Easygenerator for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 2% | 8 of 82 | 3% | 30 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Easygenerator held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Course authoring tools · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 11 → 8 of 76
Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 10% → 17%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 8 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Easygenerator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Easygenerator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct25 labels7
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative20 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels10
Scale-constrained15 labels1
Negative6 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative93 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“is Articulate Rise 360, Easygenerator, or Litmos” Llama 4 Maverick · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · first choice
“Other budget-friendly options include Easygenerator and iSpring Suite, but these typically have annual costs starting around $970–$1,290” Mistral Small · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · alternative
“Intuitive for non-designers, real-time team editing, dynamic SCORM (auto-syncs) | Limited deep customization” Grok 4.1 Fast · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Easygenerator if you want non-designers or subject matter experts to write the courses themselves” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Easygenerator is quick but limited” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Easygenerator, over the 93 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Easygenerator was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Easygenerator, over the 93 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Easygenerator was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Easygenerator. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 93 answers that named Easygenerator and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
easygenerator.comYour site73
guideflow.com58
colossyan.com53
intellum.com45
ispringsolutions.com44
elearningindustry.com43
learnworlds.com39
knowlify.com32
smartcat.com30
confirm.com28
372 of the 445 domain citations in answers naming Easygenerator came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
easygenerator.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Easygenerator takes 2% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
easygenerator.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Easygenerator takes 2% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “authoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “elearning authoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“easygenerator”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,467 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,821 · 166 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,194
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 82 in course authoring tools
Segment leader
30%
Articulate 360
- First choices
- 18 across its categories
- Named in
- 93 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 93 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on easygenerator.com
1,060
subdomains included
Content
412
counted in the table below
Documentation
185
Product · Integration
21 · 27
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 223 | 6 | 2026-09-25 | Course authoring tools, Compliance training | |
| Comparison | 47 | 14 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | 2 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| News or press | 35 | 0 | 2024-10-10 | Course authoring tools | |
| Case study | 30 | 3 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 16 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | Course authoring tools, Employee onboarding | |
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 3 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 7 | 0 | 2023-01-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Best ai voiceover tools blog
- 2026-09-25Best captioning software blog
- 2026-09-25Best screen recording software blog
- 2026-09-25Best video presentation software blog
- 2026-09-24Best video translation software blog
- 2026-09-17Equans switzerland success story case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page easygenerator.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Easygenerator
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Easygenerator; a claim can dispute any of them.
EasyGenerator 2
Follow Easygenerator
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Easygenerator is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Easygenerator is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Create company-tailored training at scale
- For
- L&D professionals, HR teams, enterprise training departments
- Price stated
- All with predictable pricing. easygenerator.com
- Starting price
- 108 easygenerator.com/en/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try free for 14 days easygenerator.com
- Certifications
- ISO27001 certifiedGDPR compliantEU SCC
- Hosting
- EuropeFrankfurt, Germany
- Customers named
- SodexoBHPGlobeAirElectroluxDSMSignifyDHLSTADA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Easygenerator's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: easygenerator.com, easygenerator.com/en/pricing, trust.easygenerator.com, easygenerator.com/en/features, easygenerator.com/en/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Easygenerator's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Easygenerator, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Easygenerator by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Easygenerator is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Easygenerator, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.