Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 16% → 22%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 104
6 categories · RankediSpring Suite
142Judge labels
21First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in Course authoring tools for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 82 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 51 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of iSpring Suite →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 112
21%49 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 82
16%51 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise14 of 96
0%28 labels
accepted challenger
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named iSpring Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 16% | 3 of 82 | 4% | 51 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 34 of 92 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Candidate assessment | Talent acquisition | 0% | 89 of 118 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 60 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 43 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 71 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 48% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, iSpring Suite held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Course authoring tools · by segment
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 3 of 76, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 12 → 14 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 15% | 16% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 82, unchanged |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 34 of 92 |
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 89 of 118 |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 89, unchanged |
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 43 of 61 |
| Online course libraries | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 66 → 71 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated iSpring Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated iSpring Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labels9
Paraphrase11 labels2
Comparative34 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained36 labels8
Scale-constrained21 labels2
Negative9 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative142 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“iSpring Suite is the best overall choice due to its balance of ease of use, PowerPoint integration, rapid authoring, and strong output quality” Mistral Small · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · first choice
“If your team already uses Microsoft PowerPoint and has existing slide decks, iSpring Free is the absolute easiest way to start.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with iSpring Suite for course creation combined with iSpring Learn for delivery and tracking” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“iSpring Suite - This is a PowerPoint-based authoring toolkit that's particularly good for creating interactive courses” MiniMax M2.5 · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“start at ~$700–1,700/year per user but offer more polish” Grok 4.1 Fast · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · soft negative
“PowerPoint-based tools will feel incredibly restrictive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iSpring Suite, over the 140 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iSpring Suite was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as iSpring Suite, over the 140 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iSpring Suite was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iSpring Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 130 of the 140 answers that named iSpring Suite and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
easygenerator.com59
ispringsolutions.com59
elearningindustry.com56
colossyan.com54
intellum.com50
guideflow.com47
learnworlds.com38
knowlify.com36
lingio.com35
teachfloor.com33
467 of the 467 domain citations in answers naming iSpring Suite came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ispring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iSpring Suite takes 16% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ispring.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iSpring Suite takes 16% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “authoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “elearning authoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“ispring suite”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 36 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 53,048 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,439 · 263 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,782
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $46 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 3 of 82 in course authoring tools
Segment leader
30%
Articulate 360
- First choices
- 21 across its categories
- Named in
- 140 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 130 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ispring.com
312
subdomains included
Content
58
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
28 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 34 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 16 | 0 | 2026-04-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-17 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-13 | ||
| Blog | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-13Free employee onboarding checklists and templates template or tool
- 2026-04-06Teachable alternatives comparison
- 2026-03-23Offboarding checklist template or tool
- 2026-03-23Kajabi alternatives comparison
- 2026-03-17What is elearning glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-16D2l brightspace alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ispring.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as iSpring Suite
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iSpring Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.
iSpring 6iSpring Free 3iSpring Suite & iSpring Learn 1iSpring Suite / iSpring Page 1iSpring Suite / iSpring Suite AI 1iSpring Suite AI 1iSpring Suite Max 1ispring 1
Follow iSpring Suite
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
iSpring Suite is its own company.ShowHide
The company
iSpring Suite is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- authoring software
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What iSpring Suite's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ispring.com, ispring.com/pricing, ispring.com/solutions/retail-lms, ispring.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iSpring Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iSpring Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iSpring Suite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where iSpring Suite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name iSpring Suite, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where iSpring Suite is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where iSpring Suite is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideiSpring Suite is among the products AI models recommend first in Course authoring tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.