| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 30% | 1 of 82 | 16% | 37 | endorsed leader | ▲+4Since September 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 22% | 26% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 22% → 26%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 82, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Articulate 360 offers the best balance of ease of use, comprehensive features, and ecosystem support.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · first choice
“Articulate 360 (The Industry Standard) Best for: Corporate training teams who need a mix of complex interactivity and quick design.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · first choice
“The industry standard for professional instructional designers.... Best for: Professional L&D teams that need maximum flexibility” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · first choice
“The Industry Standard (Best Balance of Power & Ease) ... This is the most widely used tool in corporate environments today.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: Articulate 360 ($1,199–$1,749/year) unless your budget allows” Kimi K2 · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · hard negative
“excellent, but it's usually not the best budget choice because it's priced for professional teams” GPT-5.4 mini · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · soft negative
“While this is the industry benchmark, there are significant cautions: Very high cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · soft negative
“Articulate 360 ($1,499+/year per seat) ... overkill/expensive for small teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 122 of the 128 answers that named Articulate 360 and are not a share of its labels.
421 of the 448 domain citations in answers naming Articulate 360 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 400 | 24 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 286 | 0 | 2025-11-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 198 | 17 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Case study | 83 | 8 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 44 | 5 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Comparison | 20 | 2 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Podcast or video | 16 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-30 |
As the event pages on articulate.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page articulate.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Articulate 360's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: articulate.com, articulate.com/360/pricing, trust.articulate.com, articulate.com/capabilities/scale, articulate.com/360/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Articulate 360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Articulate 360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Articulate 360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Articulate 360 first in Course authoring tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.