Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 11 of 104
1 category · RankedElucidat
83Judge labels
15First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in Course authoring tools for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 82 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Elucidat →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business11 of 112
2%15 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market9 of 82
2%18 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 96
21%50 labels
accepted challenger
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Elucidat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 2% | 9 of 82 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Elucidat held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Course authoring tools · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 12 → 9 of 76
Enterprise▲+17Since September 2026: 5% → 22%, +17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 5% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 5 → 2 of 92
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 9 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Elucidat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Elucidat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels3
Paraphrase5 labels3
Comparative23 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels5
Scale-constrained18 labels4
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Maximum collaboration & governance at scale | Elucidat, dominKnow | ONE” Kimi K2 · Course authoring tools · scale prompt · first choice
“Use standalone authoring tools (like Articulate, Elucidat, or dominKnow) that allow you to export standards-compliant files” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · alternative
“with Elucidat or Easygenerator as alternatives if collaboration, AI, or rapid SME enablement are top priorities” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · alternative
“Excellent collaboration/analytics, responsive by default, automation | Higher cost, less for solo creators” Grok 4.1 Fast · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Elucidat, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elucidat was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Elucidat, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elucidat was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Elucidat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 79 of the 83 answers that named Elucidat and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
easygenerator.com46
guideflow.com41
colossyan.com38
intellum.com36
elearningindustry.com35
ispringsolutions.com33
confirm.comYour site24
knowlify.com23
learnworlds.com22
smartcat.com17
291 of the 315 domain citations in answers naming Elucidat came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
confirm.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Elucidat takes 2% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
confirm.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Elucidat takes 2% of first choices and Articulate 360 takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “authoring tools”
3
Position for “elearning authoring tool”
4
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“elucidat”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 41,991 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,569 · 357 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,276
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 82 in course authoring tools
Segment leader
30%
Articulate 360
- First choices
- 15 across its categories
- Named in
- 83 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 79 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on confirm.com
1,462
subdomains included
Content
625
counted in the table below
Documentation
152
Product · Integration
26 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 429 | 6 | 2026-09-21 | Compliance training, Course authoring tools | |
| News or press | 44 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | Employee onboarding | |
| Podcast or video | 39 | undated | |||
| Case study | 36 | 24 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 33 | 1 | 2026-07-20 | Learning experience plat, Learning management syst | |
| Comparison | 20 | 0 | 2026-03-06 | Compliance training, Learning experience plat | |
| Report or ebook | 11 | 9 | 2026-09-07 | Performance management | |
| Conference or event | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 5 | 2026-09-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Bring learning engagement and performance together webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-29Employment rights act what employers need to do now webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-29Close your readiness gap with practice webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-29 from scale up to grown up bringing clarity to chaotic growth webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-29Sample webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-21The scale up workforce enablement gap blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page confirm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name compliance training (16); 5 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Elucidat
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Elucidat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Elucidat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Elucidat by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Elucidat is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Elucidat, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.