| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 2% | 17 of 108 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 25 of 142 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR help desk | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 17 of 108 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 142, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd usually start with Zoho Desk or Freshdesk” GPT-5.4 mini · HR help desk · budget prompt · first choice
“No-code chatbot for HR FAQs starting around $29–$15/month. Good if you want a lightweight, low-cost option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Zendesk (Suite) or Freshservice/Freshdesk: These are powerful, industry-standard tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR help desk · scale prompt · alternative
“an affordable option for small businesses that offers different ways to scale as you grow” Claude Haiku 4.5 · HR help desk · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“such as basic Jira, general Zendesk, or basic Freshdesk\u2014for HR case management without strict, dedicated HR partitions” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR help desk · negative prompt · hard negative
“be cautious: Freshworks has changed its pricing model. The permanent, generous free plan has been replaced by a temporary "Free Program"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR help desk · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 35 answers that named Freshdesk and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Freshdesk came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 258 | 54 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 165 | 7 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 162 | 18 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 107 | 4 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 64 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Blog | 63 | 5 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 30 | 3 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 23 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 18 | 0 | 2026-01-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
As the event pages on freshworks.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page freshworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Freshdesk's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: freshworks.com, freshworks.com/pricing, trust.freshworks.com, freshworks.com/products, freshworks.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Freshdesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Freshdesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Freshdesk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: