AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › FluentBooking · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

FluentBooking

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FluentBooking was named 1 time in Interview scheduling, where Calendly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FluentBooking for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition0%42 of 750%1under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, FluentBooking held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Interview scheduling · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 39 → 27 of 67
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 29 → 39 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 → 26 of 72

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Interview scheduling0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 29 → 42 of 75

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated FluentBooking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: WordPress users & growing teams” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FluentBooking, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FluentBooking was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Calendly3 of 32Not among the top eight
GoodTime2 of 30Not among the top eight
Greenhouse2 of 30Not among the top eight
VidCruiter2 of 30Not among the top eight
Cal.com1 of 31Not among the top eight
Koalendar1 of 31Not among the top eight
Homebase1 of 30Not among the top eight
Jobma1 of 30Not among the top eight
Lever1 of 30Not among the top eight
ModernLoop1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FluentBooking. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named FluentBooking and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fluentbooking.comYour site3
lever.co2
selectsoftwarereviews.com2
anywherer.com1
bestrecruitingtools.com1
cal.com1
firsthr.app1
hiretruffle.com1
intervue.io1
joveo.com1

Eleven of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming FluentBooking came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on fluentbooking.com
525
subdomains included
Content
203
counted in the table below
Documentation
268
Product · Integration
12 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog158212026-09-25Interview scheduling
Report or ebook1812026-07-17
Comparison1702026-06-09
Conference or event4undated
Glossary or explainer412026-09-16
Webinar or virtual event102025-08-19
Template or tool102025-11-12

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fluentbooking.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow FluentBooking

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

FluentBooking is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Ultimate WordPress Scheduling Solution
For
Busy Professional
Price stated
Annual: Agency $399/Year $319/Year, Small Business $199/Year $159/Year, Solo $79/Year $63/Year; Lifetime: Agency $749 $599, Small Business $436 $349, Solo $249 $199 fluentbooking.com
Starting price
$63/Year fluentbooking.com
Free plan or trial
Try Free fluentbooking.com
Integrations claimed
1000 fluentbooking.com/integrations
Customers named
Augustine MakJack ArturoDavinder Singh KainthLeo KooDavid RisleyChristopher Hughes
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What FluentBooking's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: fluentbooking.com, fluentbooking.com/pricing, fluentbooking.com/features, fluentbooking.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FluentBooking's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FluentBooking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FluentBooking by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where FluentBooking is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name FluentBooking, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fluentbooking.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.