AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Dover · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Dover

7Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Dover was named 2 times in Applicant tracking syste, where Greenhouse led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In applicant tracking syste · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Dover for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Applicant tracking systemsTalent acquisition2%11 of 650%2under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Dover held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Applicant tracking syste · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 7% in September 2026.
0%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsNot ranked
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 54, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 of 53, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Applicant tracking syste0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 11 of 65, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Dover across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Dover is one of the strongest free options available... Dover gives you unlimited jobs and seats for free.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · first choice
“Fully free ATS designed for small teams/startups... Top pick in reviews for UX” Grok 4.1 Fast · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dover, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dover was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Breezy HR6 of 72Not among the top eight
JazzHR6 of 70Not among the top eight
Zoho Recruit5 of 71Not among the top eight
100Hires2 of 70Not among the top eight
Manatal2 of 70Not among the top eight
Workable2 of 70Not among the top eight
Homerun1 of 71Not among the top eight
Pinpoint1 of 71Not among the top eight
Recruit CRM1 of 71Not among the top eight
Ashby1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dover. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Dover and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dover.comYour site5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
pin.com5
zapier.com5
metaview.ai4
uschamber.com4
ventureharbour.com4
capterra.com3
forbes.com3
jazzhr.com3

Thirty-six of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming Dover came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on dover.com
12,741
subdomains included
Content
357
counted in the table below
Documentation
54
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog247142026-09-21Applicant tracking syste, AI recruiting assistants
Comparison53102026-09-16Applicant tracking syste, Recruiting CRM
Case study22undated
Report or ebook17undated
Glossary or explainer1612026-07-13Applicant tracking syste
Conference or event2undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page dover.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Dover

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Dover is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A free applicant tracking system for startups and recruiters
For
startups and recruiters
Price stated
Free ATS; Premium ATS $199 per month dover.com/ats
Starting price
0 dover.com/ats
Free plan or trial
Free ATS dover.com/ats
Integrations claimed
50 dover.com/pricing · 100 dover.com/integrations pages disagree
Customers named
SomethingsMemora HealthOthersideAIDescriptBenchlingSection4FinaryArchive Resale
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What Dover's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: dover.com/ats, dover.com, dover.com/pricing, dover.com/case-studies, dover.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dover's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dover, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dover by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Dover is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dover, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dover.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.