AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Contingent workforce man › Deel vs Conexis VMS
Contingent workforce management · October 2026 Edition

Deel vs Conexis VMS

Zero of fourteen models named Deel first on the direct prompt; zero named Conexis VMS. Deel was named by ten of the fourteen models and Conexis VMS by eleven and Deel carries 18 labels and Conexis VMS 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Deel

accepted challenger

Named in seventeen categories this edition.

Conexis VMS

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share7%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1815A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Deel reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SimplifyVMS was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. VectorVMS vs Deel · VectorVMS vs Conexis VMS · Worksuite vs Deel

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the contingent workforce management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DeelFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConexis VMS
Direct00
Paraphrase40
Comparative00
Budget-constrained03
Scale-constrained01
Negative102 against Deel
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Deel and Conexis VMS stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Deel Conexis VMS first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Deel on the left and Conexis VMS on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Deel and Conexis VMS stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniBeeline alternatives: Conexis VMS, SAP Fieldglass, SourceNow
Gemini 3.5 FlashVectorVMS alternatives: Conexis VMS, Workday VNDLY, Worksuite
Grok 4.1 FastMagnit alternatives: Conexis VMS, SimpleVMS, SimplifyVMS, Worksuite

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Worksuite alternatives: Beeline, SimpleVMS
Perplexity SonarWorkday VNDLY alternatives: Beeline
Mistral SmallSAP Fieldglass alternatives: SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
DeepSeek V4 FlashVectorVMS alternatives: SimpleVMS, SimplifyVMS, Worksuite
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashSimplifyVMS alternatives: Magnit, VectorVMS
Kimi K2Beeline alternatives: SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS, Workday VNDLY
GLM 4.7 FlashXVectorVMS alternatives: Magnit, SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
MiniMax M2.5SimplifyVMS, Worksuite
GPT-6 LunaBeeline alternatives: Workday VNDLY, Worksuite
Muse Glimmer 30BSimpleVMS, SimplifyVMS alternatives: Beeline, Worksome VMS, Worksuite

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Conexis VMS leads by six points.
Conexis VMS9%#4 of 15
Deel4%#6 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Deel7%#5 of 12
Conexis VMS7%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Deel0%#10 of 10
Conexis VMS0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Deel

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Conexis VMS

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Conexis VMS stands out as the best vendor management system (VMS) option for managing contingent workers” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Mid-Market / Agile VMS (e.g., Worksuite, TalentDesk, Conexis)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best Overall (Transparent, Low Cost): Conexis VMS” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
VectorVMS vs DeelVectorVMS vs Conexis VMSWorksuite vs DeelWorksuite vs Conexis VMSSimplifyVMS vs DeelSimplifyVMS vs Conexis VMSBeeline vs DeelBeeline vs Conexis VMSDeel vs WorksomeDeel vs MagnitWorksome vs Conexis VMSConexis VMS vs MagnitAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full contingent workforce man standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.