Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 of 68, unchanged
HubSpot · 2 categories · Named, not rankedHubSpot Meetings
10Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HubSpot Meetings was named 4 times in Workforce scheduling and 1 other category, where Deputy led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business49 of 69
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market85 of 108
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise96 of 135
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HubSpot Meetings for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 85 of 108 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 0% | 58 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HubSpot Meetings held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce scheduling · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 75 → 79 of 99
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 67 → 83 of 122
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 75 → 85 of 108 |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 58 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Meetings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Meetings across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose HubSpot if your main priority is tracking the lead, not just the time.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Rated worst for privacy (0/5 in non-sales use)... avoid unless you're in sales” Grok 4.1 Fast · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Meetings, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Meetings was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Meetings, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Meetings was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HubSpot Meetings. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named HubSpot Meetings and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cal.com5
zeeg.me4
agiled.app3
calendly.com3
firsthr.app3
lunacal.ai3
ustechautomations.com3
youcanbook.me3
anywherer.com2
axisconsulting.io2
Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Meetings came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hubspot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HubSpot Meetings takes 0% of first choices and Deputy takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hubspot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HubSpot Meetings takes 0% of first choices and Deputy takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“hubspot meetings”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 62 a month
- Its company's site
- hubspot.com shared with HubSpot's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,276,428 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 316,975 · 13,678 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 390,754
- Paid Google search
- 15 searches its ads show for, about 2,010 clicks and $83,922 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 85 of 108 in workforce scheduling
Segment leader
37%
Deputy
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow HubSpot Meetings
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Meetings.ShowHide
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Meetings.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from HubSpot
- HubSpot Academy, HubSpot CRM, HubSpot Sales Hub, HubSpot Service Hub
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Schedule meetings faster and forget the back-and-forth emails.
- For
- sales teams
- Price stated
- Free academy.hubspot.com/streamlining-your-outreach-with-meetings
- Starting price
- Free blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-meeting
- Free plan or trial
- Get Started for Free blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-meeting
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What HubSpot Meetings's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: academy.hubspot.com/streamlining-your-outreach-with-meetings, blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-meeting, blog.hubspot.com/sales/sales-meeting-agenda, blog.hubspot.com/sales/ai-meeting-scheduling-tools, blog.hubspot.com/sales/b2b-meeting-scheduling-tools. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Meetings's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Meetings, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HubSpot Meetings by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HubSpot Meetings is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HubSpot Meetings, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.