Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 99
2 categories · Named, not rankedAssembled
14Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Assembled was named 6 times in Workforce scheduling and 1 other category, where Deputy led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market10 of 108
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Assembled for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 10 of 108 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 37% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 22 of 78 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Assembled held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce scheduling · by segment
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 of 108, unchanged |
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 22 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Assembled across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Assembled across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Top Recommendation: [Assembled](https://www.assembled.com/)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Support teams wanting faster rollout and lighter admin → Assembled” GPT-5.4 mini · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Mid-Market Customer Support / Support Operations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Assembled, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Assembled was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Assembled, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Assembled was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Assembled. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Assembled and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
assembled.comYour site9
amplifai.com5
guideflow.com5
nowsta.com5
cxfoundation.com4
ordio.com4
paycor.com4
selecthub.com4
verint.com4
youtube.com4
Thirty-nine of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Assembled came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
assembled.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Assembled takes 2% of first choices and Deputy takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
assembled.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Assembled takes 2% of first choices and Deputy takes 37%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “scheduling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee scheduling software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90,500 a month (“assembled”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 76,788 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 46,746 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,052 · 117 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,397
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 108 in workforce scheduling
Segment leader
37%
Deputy
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on assembled.com
727
subdomains included
Content
332
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
19 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 263 | 3 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 42 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 16 | 0 | 2025-09-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2024-11-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-31August 2026 product roundup blog
- 2026-08-07Code review bottlenecks how we hill climbed our way to higher pr throughput blog
- 2026-07-30Introducing workflow monitoring blog
- 2026-06-25Introducing data connectors blog
- 2026-06-15Assembled mcp use cases blog
- 2026-05-21Assembled mcp blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page assembled.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Assembled
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Assembled is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Assembled is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Workforce management built for the AI era
- For
- support teams
- Price stated
- WFM is priced per agent per month, plus a platform fee. Copilot is also priced per agent per month. AI Agents are priced per conversation with the option to also price by resolution for AI Voice. CORE $25 /month, PRO $45 /month, ENTERPRISE $75 /month. AI Agents starts at $0.65 /conversation. AI Copilot starts at $35 /month. Workforce Management starts at $25 /month. assembled.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $0.65 /conversation assembled.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2GDPRHIPAA
- Customers named
- RampCanvaHubSpotRobinhoodStripeDailyPayArbiter SportsMarshmallow
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Assembled's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: assembled.com, assembled.com/pricing, trust.assembled.com, assembled.com/features/enterprise, assembled.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Assembled's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Assembled, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Assembled by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Assembled is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Assembled, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.