AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Aspect WFM · October 2026 Edition
Aspect · 1 category · Ranked

Aspect WFM

20Judge labels
0First choices
18Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Workforce management sui for enterprise buyers
Rank 78 of 78 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 88% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aspect WFM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll0%78 of 7888%8under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Aspect WFM held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Workforce management sui · by segment

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 87 → 71 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 67 → 70 of 70

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Workforce management sui0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 87 → 78 of 78

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Aspect WFM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00022
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00011
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00022

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Aspect (complex multi-site)” Kimi K2 · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Specifically called out for frequent complaints regarding complexity, support, and user interface.” Mistral Small · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Aspect WFM (Alvaria) - 71% negative feedback rating ... Described as being "most cautious with"” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“These suites are advised to be avoided unless you have a dedicated center of excellence” Mistral Small · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Avoid Verint/Alvaria unless you have a dedicated center of excellence."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aspect WFM, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aspect WFM was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Verint Workforce Management15 of 160Not among the top eight
NICE Workforce Management11 of 160Not among the top eight
UKG Pro9 of 161Not among the top eight
Deputy8 of 160Not among the top eight
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM8 of 160Not among the top eight
ADP Workforce Now7 of 160Not among the top eight
Connecteam7 of 160Not among the top eight
Homebase7 of 160Not among the top eight
When I Work7 of 160Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors6 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aspect WFM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Aspect WFM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

assembled.com12
hr-ai-index.com11
g2.com7
firsthr.app6
nowsta.com6
hibob.com5
viewpointanalysis.com5
worldmetrics.org5
oracle.com4
rajeshkumar.xyz4

Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Aspect WFM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

aspect.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Aspect WFM takes 0% of first choices and Rippling takes 17%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “wfm suites”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “workforce management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“aspect wfm”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 17,018 a month
Searches its site ranks for
943 · 117 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,043
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
26 ads · 26 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Alvaria, Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 78 of 78 in workforce management sui
Segment leader
17%
Rippling
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on aspect.com
3,622
subdomains included
Content
540
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,178
Product · Integration
0 · 2
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog377undatedWorkforce planning, Workforce scheduling
Glossary or explainer3902025-12-18
Report or ebook2702025-12-18
Podcast or video26undated
Conference or event2532026-09-22
Comparison2012026-09-01
Webinar or virtual event1702026-05-26
Template or tool702025-12-18
Case study2undated

Events in person

Upcoming

As the event pages on aspect.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page aspect.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Aspect WFM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Aspect WFM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Alvaria (formerly Aspect) 2Alvaria 1Aspect WFM (Alvaria) 1Aspect Workforce (Alvaria) 1Aspect/Alvaria 1Verint/Alvaria 1

Follow Aspect WFM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Aspect is the company behind Aspect WFM.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise workforce management for contact centers.
For
contact centers
Certifications
PCI DSS v4.0SOC2 Type 2ISO 27001
Customers named
Best EggRCN
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Aspect WFM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aspect.com, aspect.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aspect WFM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aspect WFM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aspect WFM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Aspect WFM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Aspect WFM, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aspect.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.