| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 77 of 78 | 59% | 17 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 84 → 77 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Strong for enterprise contact centers, particularly in compliance-heavy environments” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative
“look at customer experience-centric WFM platforms like NICE CXone or Verint” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Call center / customer support WFM → NICE, Verint, or Genesys” GPT-5.4 mini · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best contact-center WFM: Verint or NICE CXone WFM” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“These suites are advised to be avoided unless you have a dedicated center of excellence” Mistral Small · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Avoid Verint/Alvaria unless you have a dedicated center of excellence."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Older on-premises versions of Verint, NICE, or Alvaria (formerly Aspect)” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verint (if you value a modern, differentiated platform)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 37 answers that named Verint Workforce Management and are not a share of its labels.
106 of the 116 domain citations in answers naming Verint Workforce Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Verint Workforce Management's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: verint.com/branch-workforce-management, verint.com/workforce-management-essentials, verint.com/back-office-workforce-management, verint.com/verint-wfm-for-webex-contact-center, verint.com/workforce-management-software-wfm-solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Verint Workforce Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Verint Workforce Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Verint Workforce Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: