AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › WorkTango · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

WorkTango

23Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Recognition and rewards for mid-market buyers
Rank 20 of 98 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In recognition and rewards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named WorkTango for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Recognition and rewardsOnboarding and employee experience0%20 of 980%4under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 29%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management0%26 of 730%2under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 34%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Employee engagement surveysOnboarding and employee experience0%28 of 580%2under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience0%62 of 1110%1under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 22%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%56 of 850%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, WorkTango held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Recognition and rewards · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 43 → 41 of 50
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 15 → 20 of 87
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 10 → 14 of 46

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Recognition and rewards0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 15 → 20 of 98
360 feedback0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 26 of 73, unchanged
Employee engagement surv0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 51 → 28 of 58
Employee wellbeing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 62 of 111, unchanged
Performance management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 56 of 85, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated WorkTango across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202103
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Kazoo if recognition should live inside a broader performance and engagement strategy” Kimi K2 · Recognition and rewards · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose WorkTango if you need governance-heavy nomination programs and operate globally” Kimi K2 · Recognition and rewards · comparative prompt · alternative
“WorkTango/Limeade if employee listening and engagement are the main priority” Perplexity Sonar · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative
“if you want a broader employee experience suite with recognition plus surveys” GPT-5.4 mini · Employee engagement surv · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkTango, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkTango was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bonusly13 of 223Not among the top eight
Workhuman12 of 224Not among the top eight
Nectar10 of 222Not among the top eight
Achievers9 of 223Not among the top eight
Awardco9 of 222Not among the top eight
Culture Amp8 of 222Not among the top eight
Assembly8 of 220Not among the top eight
Kudos8 of 220Not among the top eight
Motivosity7 of 220Not among the top eight
Lattice6 of 221Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkTango. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named WorkTango and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

workhuman.com12
achievers.com9
peoplemanagingpeople.com9
thrivesparrow.com7
tremendous.com7
awardco.com6
betterworks.com6
engagedly.com6
firsthr.app6
guideflow.com6

Seventy-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming WorkTango came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

worktango.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WorkTango takes 0% of first choices and Bonusly takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “recognition platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee recognition platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“worktango”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
21 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 23,064 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,155 · 245 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,710
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
79 ads · 47 text, 24 image, 8 video · 26 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as WorkTango, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 45 in the year, 34 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 98 in recognition and rewards
Segment leader
29%
Bonusly
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
22 answers
Its own site cited
in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on worktango.com
950
subdomains included
Content
877
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
6 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog65822026-08-06Performance management, People analytics
Webinar or virtual event69undated
News or press4702026-03-11Performance management
Report or ebook32undatedRecognition and rewards
Case study27undatedRecognition and rewards
Template or tool1902026-02-09Goals and OKRs, Employee onboarding
Glossary or explainer1202026-05-21
Comparison902026-06-02
Conference or event3undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page worktango.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as WorkTango

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WorkTango; a claim can dispute any of them.
Kazoo 1WorkTango (formerly Kazoo) 1Worktango 1

Follow WorkTango

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkTango's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkTango, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkTango by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where WorkTango is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkTango, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at worktango.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.