AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Kudos · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Kudos

75Judge labels
2First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Recognition and rewards for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Kudos →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In recognition and rewards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kudos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Recognition and rewardsOnboarding and employee experience0%13 of 984%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Goals and OKRsPerformance and talent management0%43 of 680%1under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Kudos held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Recognition and rewards · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 10 of 50
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 13 → 12 of 87
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 6 of 46

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Recognition and rewards0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 of 98, unchanged
Goals and OKRs0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 43 of 68, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Kudos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small00303
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K201113
GLM 4.7 FlashX00202
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B03003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative27 labelsNone
Budget-constrained13 labels2
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your goal is to reinforce company culture rather than handing out rewards, Kudos is excellent.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recognition and rewards · budget prompt · alternative
“Kudos is the mid-market/enterprise pick when dollar-denominated recognition and analytics matter” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recognition and rewards · direct prompt · alternative
“Kudos - offers a simple and affordable solution, with pricing starting at $2-$5/user/month.” Llama 4 Maverick · Recognition and rewards · budget prompt · alternative
“Companies wanting social recognition with enterprise-grade analytics at mid-market price” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recognition and rewards · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited scalability for large enterprises, fewer integration options” Kimi K2 · Recognition and rewards · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kudos, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kudos was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bonusly62 of 7529Not among the top eight
Nectar47 of 754Not among the top eight
Achievers37 of 758Not among the top eight
Awardco37 of 756Not among the top eight
Workhuman32 of 7515Not among the top eight
Motivosity28 of 751Not among the top eight
Guusto21 of 753Not among the top eight
Assembly21 of 751Not among the top eight
Matter16 of 753Not among the top eight
Reward Gateway12 of 751Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kudos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 70 of the 75 answers that named Kudos and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

workhuman.com46
peoplemanagingpeople.com42
engagedly.com39
tremendous.com38
thrivesparrow.com35
achievers.com34
g2.com33
kudos.comYour site31
awardco.com29
bonusly.com22

318 of the 349 domain citations in answers naming Kudos came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

kudos.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Kudos takes 0% of first choices and Bonusly takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “recognition platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee recognition platform”
4
Searches for its name, Google
60,500 a month (“kudos”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3,826 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 26,553 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,053 · 134 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,831
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
11 ads · 10 text, 1 video · 10 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as Kudos Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 6 in the year, 5 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 13 of 98 in recognition and rewards
Segment leader
29%
Bonusly
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
75 answers
Its own site cited
in 70 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on kudos.com
529
subdomains included
Content
466
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
17 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog20052026-09-25Recognition and rewards, People analytics
Glossary or explainer16002026-05-06Benefits administration, Compensation management
News or press7302025-01-30
Case study1902025-01-30
Webinar or virtual event802025-01-30
Report or ebook302025-01-30
Comparison202025-01-30
Template or tool102021-10-07
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page kudos.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Kudos

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Kudos is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Next Generation of Recognition Software
For
organizations
Free plan or trial
30-Minute Demo; Book a Call kudos.com/platform/spaces
Integrations claimed
7 kudos.com/platform/integrations
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II
Customers named
UbayOregon Community Credit UnionRussellWilsonENGIEKanika Hotels & ResortsMake-A-Wish Foundation® of AmericaKidsPeace
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, hosting

What Kudos's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: kudos.com, kudos.com/platform/spaces, kudos.com/customers, kudos.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kudos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kudos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kudos by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Kudos is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kudos, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kudos.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.