Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 46 → 50 of 50
1 category · RankedAchievers
111Judge labels
23First choices
20Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
39% in Recognition and rewards for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 33 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Achievers →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business52 of 52
0%11 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market5 of 98
8%33 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 48
39%60 labels
endorsed leader
In recognition and rewards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Achievers for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition and rewards | Onboarding and employee experience | 8% | 5 of 98 | 18% | 33 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Achievers held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Recognition and rewards · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 5 of 87
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 38% → 38%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
38%from 38% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 1 of 46, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition and rewards | 5% | 9% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 5 of 98 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Achievers across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Achievers across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels10
Paraphrase19 labels11
Comparative31 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels2
Scale-constrained12 labelsNone
Negative19 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative111 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 32 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Achievers - A customizable recognition and rewards platform designed to scale for both mid‑market organizations and large enterprise teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recognition and rewards · direct prompt · first choice
“Achievers — best for large, global, enterprise-style recognition programs with strong analytics and integrations.” GPT-5.4 mini · Recognition and rewards · comparative prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder for Growth: Achievers ... Achievers is the industry leader.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recognition and rewards · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend starting with Nectar or Achievers.” MiniMax M2.5 · Recognition and rewards · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid or be cautious with Bonusly (SMB versions), Awardco, Achievers, and generic Slack/Teams integrations” Mistral Small · Recognition and rewards · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms: Solutions like Workhuman, Awardco, and Achievers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recognition and rewards · budget prompt · hard negative
“Counterintuitive interface, clunky navigation, limited point spending options, high point requirements for mediocre rewards” Kimi K2 · Recognition and rewards · negative prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise platforms (Workhuman, Achievers)—overbuilt, slow implementation, expensive” Kimi K2 · Recognition and rewards · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Achievers, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Achievers was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Achievers, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Achievers was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Achievers. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 107 of the 111 answers that named Achievers and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
achievers.comYour site81
workhuman.com65
g2.com57
tremendous.com47
peoplemanagingpeople.com45
engagedly.com44
awardco.com43
thrivesparrow.com36
blackthorn-vision.com32
selectsoftwarereviews.com30
399 of the 480 domain citations in answers naming Achievers came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
achievers.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Achievers takes 8% of first choices and Bonusly takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
achievers.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Achievers takes 8% of first choices and Bonusly takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “recognition platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee recognition platform”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“achievers”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 69,832 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 295,924 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,085 · 1,850 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,316
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 98 in recognition and rewards
Segment leader
29%
Bonusly
- First choices
- 23 across its categories
- Named in
- 111 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 107 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on achievers.com
1,483
subdomains included
Content
1,272
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
85 · 7
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 398 | 59 | 2026-09-28 | Recognition and rewards, Performance management | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 225 | 7 | 2026-07-22 | Recognition and rewards | |
| Report or ebook | 223 | 12 | 2026-09-28 | Recognition and rewards | |
| News or press | 168 | 3 | 2026-09-10 | Recognition and rewards | |
| Case study | 150 | 4 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 47 | 0 | 2022-10-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 30 | 2 | 2026-10-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 15 | 0 | 2026-02-20 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 10 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-02-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-12Achievers at workday rising conference or event
- 2026-10-06Gartner hr symposium conference or event
- 2026-09-28Employee turnover by industry blog
- 2026-09-28Employee recognition business performance infographic blog
- 2026-09-28Employee recognition business performance infographic blog
- 2026-09-28Employee recognition business performance infographic blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 12, 2026 to October 15, 2026Achievers at Workday RisingLas Vegas, US · speaks
- November 16, 2026 to November 17, 2026Gartner HR Symposium conference 2026Sydney, Australia · exhibits
Last twelve months
- October 6, 2026 to October 8, 2026Achievers at Gartner HR SymposiumLondon, United Kingdom · exhibited
As the event pages on achievers.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page achievers.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Achievers
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Achievers is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Achievers is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Employee recognition and rewards software
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- custom pricing achievers.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 achievers.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPACSAPIPEDAISO 27001:2022ISO 27001 : 2022 CertificateCSA Star (Gold) Certificate
- Hosting
- AustraliaCanadaSingaporeUnited KingdomUnited StatesGlobal
- Customers named
- General MotorsChristus HealthKellanovaPointClickCare TechnologiesATB Financial
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations
What Achievers's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: achievers.com, achievers.com/pricing, trust.achievers.com, achievers.com/platform, achievers.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Achievers's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Achievers, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Achievers by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Achievers is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Achievers, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.