Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 82 → 66 of 77
Workday · 1 category · Named, not rankedWorkday Prism Analytics
13Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workday Prism Analytics was named 4 times in People analytics, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business72 of 81
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market84 of 114
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise25 of 79
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday Prism Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 84 of 114 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday Prism Analytics held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 41 → 86 of 101
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 62 → 25 of 72
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 41 → 84 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday Prism Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday Prism Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Already on Workday and want embedded analytics? → Workday People Analytics / Prism” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for HRIS-native predictive analytics” Muse Glimmer 30B · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“native tools often charge exorbitant fees for specialized data lakes (like *Workday Prism*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users frequently cite "notorious" complexity and six-figure annual contracts.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Prism Analytics, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Prism Analytics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Prism Analytics, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Prism Analytics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Prism Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Workday Prism Analytics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hr.university6
workhuman.com6
effy.ai5
firsthr.app5
eletive.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
thoughtspot.com4
visier.com4
hrbench.com3
learn.g2.com3
Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Workday Prism Analytics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Workday Prism Analytics
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Prism Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday People Analytics / Prism 1Workday People Analytics / Workday Prism Analytics 1Workday Prism 1Workday Prism / People Analytics 1
Follow Workday Prism Analytics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Prism Analytics.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Prism Analytics.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Workday's engine for bringing external data into Workday — ingesting, transforming, and enriching it so HR and Finance teams can self-serve the insights they need.
- For
- HR and Finance teams
- Free plan or trial
- Usage is only counted in production, and sandbox testing is free. workday.com/en-us/topics/it/guide-prism-to-data-cloud.html
- Customers named
- Unum3MLife Time
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workday Prism Analytics's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: workday.com/en-us/topics/it/guide-prism-to-data-cloud.html, workday.com/fr-fr/resources/prism-analytics/data-hub-use-cases.html, workday.com/de-de/resources/prism-analytics/data-hub-use-cases.html, workday.com/en-us/resources/prism-analytics/data-hub-use-cases.html, workday.com/ja-jp/resources/prism-analytics/data-hub-use-cases.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Prism Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Prism Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Prism Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday Prism Analytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Prism Analytics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.