| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 33 of 108 | 33% | 12 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 90 → 33 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Full-suite HCM and finance platform with powerful workflow automation across the employee lifecycle, favoured by large and complex enterprises.” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR help desk · comparative prompt · alternative
“Workday is primarily an HCM system of record — ... rather than a dedicated service delivery platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR help desk · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Companies seeking an "all-in-one" solution where HR service is linked directly to payroll” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HR help desk · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Enterprises already on Workday, seeking an all-in-one system with deep data integration.” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR help desk · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise HCM Suites like Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM" ... flagged as overkill” Muse Glimmer 30B · HR help desk · negative prompt · hard negative
“Security configuration complexity ... customization limitations, high cost | Requires strong internal security expertise; hidden costs” Kimi K2 · HR help desk · negative prompt · soft negative
“Often criticized for non-intuitive interfaces, steep learning curves... Workday is still a Leader despite UX gripes” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR help desk · negative prompt · soft negative
“Full HCM suite, expensive for case management alone” Kimi K2 · HR help desk · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 50 answers that named Workday HR Service Delivery and are not a share of its labels.
204 of the 204 domain citations in answers naming Workday HR Service Delivery came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Workday HR Service Delivery's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: workday.com/nl-nl/topics/hr/hr-service-delivery.html, workday.com/fr-fr/topics/hr/hr-service-delivery.html, workday.com/de-de/topics/hr/hr-service-delivery.html, workday.com/es-es/topics/hr/hr-service-delivery.html, workday.com/it-it/topics/hr/hr-service-delivery.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday HR Service Delivery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday HR Service Delivery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday HR Service Delivery by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: