Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 35 of 99, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedWorkativ
3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workativ was named 2 times in HR help desk, where Zoho Desk led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market39 of 108
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In hr help desk · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workativ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 39 of 108 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workativ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · HR help desk · by segment
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR help desk | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 108, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workativ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workativ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ClearFeed, Workativ, or eesel AI: These tools layer directly onto your existing messaging apps” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR help desk · scale prompt · alternative
“Want to reduce ticket volume with a chatbot first | Workativ” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR help desk · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workativ, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workativ was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workativ, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workativ was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workativ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Workativ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hrcloud.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
workativ.comYour site2
zendesk.com2
appsruntheworld.com1
atlassian.com1
bizbot.com1
capterra.com1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1
clearfeed.ai1
Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Workativ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workativ.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workativ takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Desk takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workativ.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workativ takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Desk takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “hr help desk software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “hr service delivery tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“workativ”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,110 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 496 · 12 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 976
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 39 of 108 in HR help desk
Segment leader
19%
Zoho Desk
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 3 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workativ.com
352
subdomains included
Content
112
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 58
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 98 | 15 | 2026-09-09 | Employee onboarding, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Comparison | 12 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09Ai agent for hr use cases 12 workflows hr directors can automate in 2026 blog
- 2026-09-08Ai agent for employee queries how hr teams automate the top 10 requests blog
- 2026-09-07Best ai agents for hr in 2026 ranked and compared blog
- 2026-09-03Adp ai agent guide 2026 automate payroll hr support and employee workflows blog
- 2026-09-01Workday ai agent complete guide to hr self service and automation in 2026 blog
- 2026-08-24Servicenow ai agent guide it hr setup and pricing blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workativ.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Workativ
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workativ is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Workativ is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI agent platform for HR and IT teams
- For
- HR and IT teams
- Price stated
- Workativ uses session and execution-based pricing you pay for what you use, not for headcount. Plans start at $349/month (Business, full HR and IT automation), and custom pricing for Mid-Market and Enterprise organizations. No per-user fees. workativ.com
- Starting price
- 349 workativ.com
- Free plan or trial
- Get a free demo workativ.com
- Integrations claimed
- 100 workativ.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAISO/IEC 27001:2013 compliantISO 27001 CertifiedSOC II CertifiedGDPR Compliant
- Customers named
- GoTo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Workativ's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: workativ.com, workativ.com/pricing, workativ.com/security, workativ.com/features/app-workflow, workativ.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workativ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workativ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workativ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workativ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workativ, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.