AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Woliba · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Woliba

36Judge labels
8First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Employee wellbeing for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Woliba →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Woliba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience4%7 of 1110%10accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial wellness platformsCompensation and total rewards0%70 of 1170%1under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, Woliba held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Employee wellbeing · by segment

Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 → 2 of 78
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 23 → 7 of 106
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 10 of 62

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Employee wellbeing0%4%▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 23 → 7 of 111
Financial wellness0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 70 of 117, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Woliba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512003
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash11103
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels6
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My #1 recommendation: Woliba — because its pay-for-active-users model means you only spend money on what actually gets used.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice
“Woliba is often highlighted as the best employee wellbeing platform for companies with a limited budget” Mistral Small · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice
“Woliba is ranked as the top platform for mid-market to enterprise teams seeking consolidation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Leads as the top employee wellness platform by combining health challenges, peer-to-peer recognition, automated rewards, and pulse surveys” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Woliba, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Woliba was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Calm Health11 of 360Not among the top eight
Wellhub10 of 360Not among the top eight
Personify Health9 of 360Not among the top eight
Avidon Health5 of 361Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Woliba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 36 answers that named Woliba and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

woliba.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Woliba takes 4% of first choices and Wellable takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “wellbeing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “employee wellbeing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“woliba”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
11 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,077 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,740 · 10 in the top three
Sites linking to it
658
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 111 in employee wellbeing
Segment leader
22%
Wellable
First choices
8 across its categories
Named in
36 answers
Its own site cited
in 36 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on woliba.io
239
subdomains included
Content
239
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog176112026-09-28Employee engagement surv
Comparison4362026-09-09
Case study1632026-08-19
Glossary or explainer202023-06-03
Report or ebook1undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page woliba.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Woliba

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Woliba is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Employee Wellness Platform Designed For A Healthier, Happier Culture.
For
HR and People leaders
Price stated
Pricing woliba.io
Free plan or trial
Get full access to Woliba free for 21 days — challenges, recognition, rewards, and wellness analytics your team will actually use. No credit card Required woliba.io
Certifications
SOC 2HIPAAISO CertifiedGDPR
Customers named
accessGilsbarRichardson IndustriesSpring Oaks CapitalE-J ElectricIdaho SIFHigh Point UniversityPURE Group of Insurance Companies
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Woliba's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: woliba.io, woliba.io/blog/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Woliba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Woliba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Woliba by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Woliba is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Woliba, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at woliba.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.