Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
2 categories · Named, not rankedWagepoint
6Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wagepoint was named 2 times in Compensation management and 1 other category, where Pave led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market134 of 140
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise123 of 126
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Wagepoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 134 of 140 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Payroll software | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 49 of 58 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Wagepoint held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 127 of 131, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 106 of 109, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 134 of 140, unchanged |
| Payroll software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 49 of 58, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Wagepoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Wagepoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Frequent issues with very poor customer support..., severe software glitches that delay payments” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compensation management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Users report severe UI issues and poor user experience” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Payroll software · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wagepoint, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wagepoint was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wagepoint, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wagepoint was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wagepoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Wagepoint and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
trustpilot.com4
capterra.com3
forbes.com3
complaintsboard.com2
g2.com2
gummysearch.com2
learn.g2.com2
onpay.com2
patriotsoftware.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Wagepoint came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on wagepoint.com
246
subdomains included
Content
170
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 95 | 23 | 2026-09-22 | Payroll software, Employee onboarding | |
| Report or ebook | 37 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | Payroll software | |
| Case study | 16 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | Payroll software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 2 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| News or press | 7 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2024-12-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22How wagepoint handles quebecs unique requirements blog
- 2026-09-22Wagepoint ends the two system workaround for quebec payroll with new launch news or press
- 2026-09-215 payroll mistakes that cost small businesses blog
- 2026-09-21The integration premium why fragmented ledgers fail small business financial health blog
- 2026-09-1824876 blog
- 2026-09-14Take up that tech blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page wagepoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Wagepoint
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Wagepoint is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Wagepoint is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Canadian payroll software that makes every payday simple, accurate, and on time.
- For
- Canadian small businesses and the accountants and bookkeepers who support them
- Price stated
- simple pricing built for Canadian small businesses wagepoint.com
- Starting price
- 20 wagepoint.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start a free trial wagepoint.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 certificationSOC 1 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2SOC 3CPD-eligible
- Hosting
- Canada
- Customers named
- Dubbeldam Architecture + DesignAtlantic Tennis CentreSummit Professional Services Inc.iAutomateMB Renos & CarpentryStonegate Electrical Contracting CorporationGlacier AccountingMarshy Mallows Inc.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Wagepoint's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: wagepoint.com, wagepoint.com/pricing, trust.wagepoint.com, wagepoint.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wagepoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wagepoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wagepoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Wagepoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wagepoint, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.