Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 26 of 58
Trello
26Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Trello was named 7 times in Goals and OKRs and 4 other categories, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 63
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market50 of 68
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise48 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Trello for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 50 of 68 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 51 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 93 of 95 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 80 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 51 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Trello held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 30 → 44 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 51 → 43 of 54
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 50 of 68 |
| Employee onboarding | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 51 of 87 |
| Leave | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 93 of 95, unchanged |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 95, unchanged |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 51 of 85 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Trello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Trello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have zero budget and want to organize your existing materials: Use Notion or Trello.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative
“consider building a simple OKR system there rather than buying new software” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“You may be tempted to use tools like Trello, Asana, Jira, Monday.com, or ClickUp to manage leave, but these should generally be avoided” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Leave · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid using these as your *primary* home for OKR tracking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trello, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trello was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trello, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trello was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trello. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 26 answers that named Trello and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
g2.com5
firsthr.app4
mooncamp.com4
tability.io4
capterra.com3
clickup.com3
forbes.com3
itechguides.com3
okrstool.com3
No domain is on file for Trello, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Trello stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Trello stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“trello”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4,827 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 50 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 26 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Trello
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trello; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Sheets/Notion/Trello 1
Follow Trello
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trello's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trello, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trello by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trello is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trello, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.