Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 47 → 41 of 69
8 categories · RankedGoogle Sheets
53Judge labels
1First choices
28Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
8Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Org charts for mid-market buyers
Rank 24 of 95 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business44 of 72
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 95
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise74 of 86
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Google Sheets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 24 of 95 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 52 of 68 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 95 of 95 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 44 of 114 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 60 of 85 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 85 of 93 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mentoring software | Learning and development | 0% | 43 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Together at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 94 of 98 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Google Sheets held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 25 → 23 of 90
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 75 → 69 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 24 of 95 |
| Goals and OKRs | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 52 of 68 |
| Leave | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 81 → 95 of 95 |
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 44 of 114 |
| Performance management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 60 of 85 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 85 of 93 |
| Mentoring software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 77, unchanged |
| Workforce planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 94 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Google Sheets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Google Sheets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative30 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Already using Google Workspace? → Google Sheets/Slides with templates — zero cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative
“spreadsheet software is actually one of the cheapest ways to handle org charts” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative
“Use Canva (for beauty) or Google Sheets (for speed).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Simple Spreadsheets (Excel / Google Sheets) ... you should avoid using spreadsheets as a primary system” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Leave · negative prompt · hard negative
“The "DIY" Trap: Static Spreadsheets (Excel/Google Sheets) for Scaled Operations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · hard negative
“Homegrown Spreadsheets and Emails (The Risk Trap)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Leave · negative prompt · hard negative
“Static Spreadsheets (Excel / Google Sheets) for Large Scales ... are highly prone to data entry errors, and offer no governance, security, or audit trails” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Succession planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Google Sheets, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Sheets was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Google Sheets, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Sheets was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Sheets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 53 answers that named Google Sheets and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app23
peoplemanagingpeople.com17
g2.com14
guideflow.com11
capterra.com10
forbes.com10
engagedly.com9
okrstool.com9
softwareadvice.com9
tability.io8
120 of the 120 domain citations in answers naming Google Sheets came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
google.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Google Sheets takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
google.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Google Sheets takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,350,000 a month (“google sheets”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 53,730 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,800,358,416 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 16,240,774 · 2,471,277 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 28,655,444
- Paid Google search
- 243 searches its ads show for, about 42,266 clicks and $465,944 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 53 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 46 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on google.com
7,607
subdomains included
Content
1,201
counted in the table below
Documentation
137
Product · Integration
18 · 84
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 707 | undated | |||
| Blog | 372 | 0 | 2018-12-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 51 | 0 | 2018-12-13 | ||
| Comparison | 35 | undated | |||
| News or press | 34 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2018-12-13Best practices for in app rewarded video ads blog
- 2018-12-13How to monetize your mobile apps with ads blog
- 2018-12-13What is AdMob - Google AdMob glossary or explainer
- 2018-11-19App marketing strategies to grow and monetize your app blog
- 2018-11-19How much revenue can you earn from admob blog
- 2018-11-19How to earn money with in app advertising blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page google.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Google Sheets
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Sheets; a claim can dispute any of them.
Excel / Google Sheets 3Google Sheets / Microsoft Excel 1Google Sheets / Slack 1Google Sheets / Slides 1Google Sheets/Notion/Trello 1
Follow Google Sheets
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Google Sheets is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Google Sheets is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Collaborative, AI-powered spreadsheets
- Customers named
- Globe TelecomUltraEtsyAdore MeRobinhoodAttache
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Google Sheets's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: workspace.google.com/products/sheets, google.com, google.com/adwords/express/pricing, google.com/admob/platform.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Sheets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Sheets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Sheets by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Google Sheets is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Sheets, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.