Every category where a model named Trakstar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	0%	14 of 73	0%	13	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	19 of 85	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 43%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	68 of 128	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 20%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Trakstar held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · 360 feedback · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 60

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 22 → 14 of 69

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 40 → 17 of 59

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
360 feedback	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 22 → 14 of 73
Performance management	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 17 → 19 of 85
Coaching platforms	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 82 → 68 of 128

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Trakstar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	3	0	3
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained14 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Built primarily around structured performance appraisals, with 360 multi-rater feedback available as part of the review workflow.” Llama 4 Maverick · 360 feedback · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Small and mid-sized businesses seeking straightforward 360 degree feedback without enterprise complexity” MiniMax M2.5 · 360 feedback · budget prompt · alternative

“Trakstar is suitable if you prefer a more established platform and are willing to request a custom quote.” Mistral Small · 360 feedback · budget prompt · alternative

“Other budget-friendly options include Trakstar, which starts at $5-$10 per user monthly for small teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · 360 feedback · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trakstar, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trakstar was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice25 of 475Not among the top eight

15Five25 of 473Not among the top eight

Leapsome23 of 476Not among the top eight

Effy AI19 of 4710Not among the top eight

Culture Amp16 of 473Not among the top eight

Small Improvements13 of 474Not among the top eight

Spidergap13 of 473Not among the top eight

Primalogik12 of 472Not among the top eight

PerformYard11 of 470Not among the top eight

BambooHR10 of 472Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trakstar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 47 answers that named Trakstar and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

betterworks.com33

workhuman.com32

feedbackpulse.com29

firsthr.app21

forbes.com21

intervue.io20

peoplemanagingpeople.com18

guideflow.com16

capterra.com14

effy.ai14

218 of the 218 domain citations in answers naming Trakstar came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools29

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-360-review-software24

workhuman.com/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software-tools23

intervue.io/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software20

firsthr.app/compare/performance/360-feedback-software18

teamflect.com/blog/hr-tech/best-360-feedback-tools14

nanoglobals.com/recommended/360-degree-feedback-tools13

charliehr.com/performance-management/360-feedback-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

trakstar.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trakstar takes 0% of first choices and Lattice takes 34%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “360 feedback tools”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “360-degree feedback tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,900 a month (“trakstar”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 59 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 11,914 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,714 · 191 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 8,087
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 120 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Mitratech Holdings, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 44 in the year, 76 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 14 of 73 in 360 feedback

Segment leader

34%

Lattice

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 47 answers
Its own site cited: in 46 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on trakstar.com

1,501

subdomains included

Content

591

counted in the table below

Documentation

661

Product · Integration

63 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	356	undated	Performance management, Succession planning
Webinar or virtual event	88	undated	Performance management
Podcast or video	57	undated
Report or ebook	37	undated	Performance management, Succession planning
Comparison	21	undated	Performance management
Glossary or explainer	14	undated	Performance management
Case study	8	undated
Template or tool	6	undated
Conference or event	3	undated
News or press	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page trakstar.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Trakstar

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trakstar; a claim can dispute any of them.

Trakstar (Mitratech) 1Trakstar Perform 1

Follow Trakstar

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Trakstar is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Employee Performance Software
trakstar.com
For: HR professionals
trakstar.com
Price stated: Pricing trakstar.com
Certifications: AICPA SOCSOC 2GDPRCalifornia Consumer Privacy ActEU-U.S. Privacy Shield FrameworkAWS SOC 2ISO 27001:2013
Customers named: AmazonMarkey'sPacific Northwest UniversityRedwireAxonMicrobixBryan ConstructionBausch Health
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Trakstar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trakstar.com, trakstar.com/pricing, trakstar.com/security, trakstar.com/solutions, trakstar.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trakstar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trakstar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trakstar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Trakstar is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trakstar, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.