Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 8 → 12 of 54
1 category · RankedTimeCamp
29Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Time and attendance for small business buyers
Rank 12 of 86 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 57
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 86
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 87
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TimeCamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 12 of 86 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TimeCamp held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Time and attendance · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 13 of 77
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 86 → 24 of 76
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | 6% | 2% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 12 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TimeCamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TimeCamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained18 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“such as Homebase or TimeCamp... TimeCamp starts at $2.99 per user per month if you choose annual billing” Llama 4 Maverick · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need invoicing and detailed analytics: Choose TimeCamp (free + ~$4/user/mo).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · budget prompt · alternative
“you can consider more feature-rich options like TimeCamp or QuickBooks Time” MiniMax M2.5 · Time and attendance · budget prompt · alternative
“TimeCamp is extremely affordable, starting at just $2.99 per user per month” Muse Glimmer 30B · Time and attendance · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TimeCamp, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TimeCamp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TimeCamp, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TimeCamp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TimeCamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named TimeCamp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
forbes.com21
guideflow.com15
timetrex.com15
techrepublic.com13
ontheclock.com11
jibble.io10
joinhomebase.com10
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
buddypunch.com7
firsthr.app7
117 of the 117 domain citations in answers naming TimeCamp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
timecamp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TimeCamp takes 2% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
timecamp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TimeCamp takes 2% of first choices and Clockify takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “time and attendance system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “time and attendance systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“timecamp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 48 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 132,103 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 18,808 · 517 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,626
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 86 in time and attendance
Segment leader
12%
Clockify
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 29 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on timecamp.com
3,545
subdomains included
Content
681
counted in the table below
Documentation
767
Product · Integration
11 · 245
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 313 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | Time and attendance | |
| Glossary or explainer | 286 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | Time and attendance, Workforce management sui | |
| Comparison | 42 | 7 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 19 | 0 | 2025-05-14 | ||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25What is clio glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-24What is homebase glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-22Best time tracking software for consultants blog
- 2026-09-16Toggl reviews blog
- 2026-09-16Best time tracking software for construction blog
- 2026-09-14Clockify reviews blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page timecamp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow TimeCamp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TimeCamp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TimeCamp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- automatic time tracking software
- For
- teams of any size
- Price stated
- Free $0; Starter Time & Billing $3.99 /mo; Premium Profit & Productivity $6.99 /mo; Ultimate Analytics & Collaboration $9.99 /mo; Enterprise Management & Security On Request timecamp.com
- Starting price
- 0 timecamp.com
- Free plan or trial
- free forever plan; 14-day trial timecamp.com
- Integrations claimed
- 80 timecamp.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPRDCAASOC2HIPAAISO 20071ISO27001
- Customers named
- 7CGIMirador AnalyticsGonitoBluerankDWSAktanaConstruoEGTC Infra
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What TimeCamp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: timecamp.com, timecamp.com/pricing, timecamp.com/security, timecamp.com/use-cases, timecamp.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TimeCamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TimeCamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TimeCamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TimeCamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TimeCamp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.