| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 5% | 7 of 104 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 2% | 14 of 75 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 20% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 34 of 65 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 24 of 90 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Manatal at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Job advertising and distribution | Talent acquisition | 0% | 54 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 23% | |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 43 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment marketing | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 7 of 104 |
| Interview scheduling | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 14 of 75 |
| Applicant tracking syste | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 34 of 65 |
| AI recruiting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 90, unchanged |
| Job advertising | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 111, unchanged |
| Talent intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Recruitee and Workable are excellent all‑around choices that balance career site builder quality, ATS integration, and mid‑market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Recruitee or Workable as your recruiting coordination tool” Mistral Small · Interview scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“platforms like Teamtailor and Recruitee are often cited for mid-market teams” Muse Glimmer 30B · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · first choice
“The best career site builder for a mid-sized B2B company would be Recruitee” Llama 4 Maverick · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Reports of scammers using the platform to post fake jobs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 66 answers that named Recruitee and are not a share of its labels.
161 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Recruitee came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 326 | 5 | 2026-08-13 | Applicant tracking syste, HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Case study | 28 | 5 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | 0 | 2024-11-01 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2025-12-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2024-11-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2022-06-24 |
Every page recruitee.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Recruitee's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: recruitee.com, recruitee.com/pricing, recruitee.com/compliance, recruitee.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recruitee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recruitee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Recruitee by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: