AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Sysarb · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Sysarb

15Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sysarb was named 8 times in Pay equity, where Syndio led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sysarb for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Pay equityCompensation and total rewards2%15 of 730%8under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 12%▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Sysarb held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Pay equity · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 37 of 71, unchanged
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 15 of 67
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 18 of 60

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Pay equity5%2%▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 7 → 15 of 73

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Sysarb across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Top Pick for European/Multi-National Growth: Sysarb” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sysarb is a strong fit for mid-size to enterprise companies in Europe, navigating pay transparency legislation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If your company is in Europe or subject to pay transparency laws, Sysarb is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · Pay equity · direct prompt · alternative
“For a focused, EU-ready pay equity tool, Sysarb is a top pick.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sysarb, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sysarb was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Syndio12 of 156Not among the top eight
Trusaic PayParity6 of 151Not among the top eight
beqom Pay Equity6 of 150Not among the top eight
Figures5 of 152Not among the top eight
Aeqium4 of 151Not among the top eight
PayAnalytics4 of 151Not among the top eight
Payscale4 of 150Not among the top eight
Workleap Compensation3 of 152Not among the top eight
CompUp3 of 151Not among the top eight
BambooHR3 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sysarb. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Sysarb and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com13
effy.ai9
compensationtools.net7
figures.hr7
gartner.com7
guideflow.com7
orbiqhq.com7
g2.com5
ravio.com5
sourceforge.net5

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Sysarb came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sysarb.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sysarb takes 2% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “pay equity tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pay equity analysis software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
50 a month (“sysarb”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 22 a month
Searches its site ranks for
20 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it
218
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 73 in pay equity
Segment leader
12%
Syndio
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sysarb.com
368
subdomains included
Content
129
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog5902026-06-02Pay equity
Webinar or virtual event5302026-06-15
Case study10undated
Glossary or explainer502026-06-02Pay equity
Report or ebook102025-06-11
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sysarb.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Sysarb

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sysarb is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Leading Pay Equity Platform; an all-in-one SaaS platform that helps 1000+ HR-teams automate compliance with every requirement of the EU Pay Transparency Directive.
For
HR-teams
Price stated
competitive pricing sysarb.com
Integrations claimed
70 sysarb.com
Certifications
ISO 27001GDPR-compliantGDPR compliant
Customers named
PolestarAbsolut CompanyAvalanchersRustaWndyKlarnaThe Absolut CompanyTrustly
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Sysarb's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sysarb.com, sysarb.com/pricing, sysarb.com/customers, sysarb.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sysarb's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sysarb, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sysarb by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sysarb is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sysarb, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sysarb.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.