Small business=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 6 → 7 of 71
1 category · RankedPayAnalytics
63Judge labels
17First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Pay equity for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PayAnalytics →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 78
4%17 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 73
12%24 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 68
17%22 labels
accepted challenger
In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PayAnalytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 12% | 2 of 73 | 4% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PayAnalytics held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Pay equity · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 67
Enterprise▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 17%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 2% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 6 → 2 of 60
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | 14% | 11% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PayAnalytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PayAnalytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels6
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative19 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels7
Scale-constrained7 labels4
Negative6 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best Overall for Mid-Market Analytics: PayAnalytics (by beqom) ... widely considered the gold standard for the mid-market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pay equity · direct prompt · first choice
“Opt for robust platforms like Syndio, Trusaic, or PayAnalytics with regression analysis, PAG grouping, and remediation sims” Grok 4.1 Fast · Pay equity · negative prompt · first choice
“PayAnalytics | Mid-market friendly, published pricing | Companies at your size wanting a solid regression-based tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · scale prompt · first choice
“PayAnalytics is the leading tool for organizations that need rigorous statistical validation of their pay data.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pay equity · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“usually more enterprise-oriented and demo-based, so likely less budget-friendly” GPT-5.4 mini · Pay equity · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PayAnalytics, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PayAnalytics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PayAnalytics, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PayAnalytics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PayAnalytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named PayAnalytics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com50
effy.ai45
compensationtools.net33
guideflow.com33
hrtechsaas.com28
worldmetrics.org26
payanalytics.comYour site23
synd.io23
gartner.com22
sourceforge.net22
282 of the 305 domain citations in answers naming PayAnalytics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
payanalytics.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, PayAnalytics takes 12% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
payanalytics.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, PayAnalytics takes 12% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “pay equity tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pay equity analysis software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“payanalytics”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,025 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 659 · 10 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 383
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
12%
rank 2 of 73 in pay equity
Segment leader
12%
Syndio
- First choices
- 17 across its categories
- Named in
- 63 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on payanalytics.com
486
subdomains included
Content
143
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
11 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 89 | 0 | 2025-12-17 | Pay equity, People analytics | |
| News or press | 33 | 0 | 2024-05-14 | Pay equity | |
| Report or ebook | 12 | 0 | 2025-01-30 | Pay equity, People analytics | |
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2022-08-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2023-02-13 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2025-07-10 | Pay equity | |
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2022-12-02 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-03-31 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-02-15 |
Most recent
- 2025-12-17Pay equity reporting requirements south africa blog
- 2025-11-27Italy pay gap reporting eu pay transparency directive transposition blog
- 2025-11-25Workers councils how payanalytics helps secure employee rights blog
- 2025-10-06Slovakia transposition law for eu pay transparency directive blog
- 2025-09-23The netherlands transposes the eu pay transparency directive blog
- 2025-08-08Malta implements eu pay transparency directive blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page payanalytics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PayAnalytics
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PayAnalytics; a claim can dispute any of them.
PayAnalytics (by beqom) 4PayAnalytics (beqom) 2beqom / PayAnalytics 2PayAnalytics / beqom 1beqom/PayAnalytics 1
Follow PayAnalytics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PayAnalytics is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PayAnalytics is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- pay equity and workforce analytics software
- For
- companies
- Certifications
- ISO IEC 27001ISO IEC 27001 Certified by Crimson SecurityUniversal Fair Pay CheckGender and Diversity KPI Alliance
- Customers named
- ÍstakLyfjaReykjavík EnergyThe National University Hospital of Iceland
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What PayAnalytics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: payanalytics.com, payanalytics.com/product/reports. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PayAnalytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PayAnalytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PayAnalytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PayAnalytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PayAnalytics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where PayAnalytics is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where PayAnalytics is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHidePayAnalytics is among the products AI models recommend first in Pay equity this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.