Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 70 of 71
Trusaic · 1 category · RankedTrusaic PayParity
114Judge labels
6First choices
37Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Pay equity for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 73 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 38 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Trusaic PayParity →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business77 of 78
0%30 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market9 of 73
4%38 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise3 of 68
8%46 labels
accepted challenger
In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Trusaic PayParity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 4% | 9 of 73 | 29% | 38 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Trusaic PayParity held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Pay equity · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 → 12 of 67
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 60
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | 5% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 9 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Trusaic PayParity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Trusaic PayParity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels1
Paraphrase17 labels3
Comparative24 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labelsNone
Scale-constrained15 labels2
Negative21 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the platforms most commonly cited are Syndio, Trusaic or PayAnalytics, depending on whether priority is legal defensibility, remediation workflow or global coverage” Muse Glimmer 30B · Pay equity · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Trusaic PayParity if you need remediation planning, audit-ready reporting, and multi-country compliance.” Perplexity Sonar · Pay equity · comparative prompt · first choice
“or PayParity if you prioritize detailed pay equity analysis. Both have strong mid-market presence” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For large global enterprises, Syndio and Trusaic PayParity lead the market.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise-focused with quote-only pricing; ... overkill for most small companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise statistical audit giants (e.g., Syndio, Beqom, Trusaic) are highly robust but typically require custom enterprise contracts and significant implementation effort.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pay equity · negative prompt · soft negative
“premium, high-end enterprise pay equity software (like Syndio, Trusaic, or Beqom), which typically ... cost tens of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Pay equity · budget prompt · soft negative
“robust tools like Syndio and Trusaic are highly reliable, they are designed for large enterprises and may be overkill—and cost-prohibitive” Mistral Small · Pay equity · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trusaic PayParity, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trusaic PayParity was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trusaic PayParity, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trusaic PayParity was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trusaic PayParity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 110 of the 112 answers that named Trusaic PayParity and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com79
effy.ai69
compensationtools.net62
trusaic.comYour site56
synd.io51
guideflow.com49
gartner.com40
hr-ai-index.com31
hrtechsaas.com31
worldmetrics.org31
443 of the 499 domain citations in answers naming Trusaic PayParity came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
trusaic.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Trusaic PayParity takes 4% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
trusaic.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Trusaic PayParity takes 4% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “pay equity tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pay equity analysis software”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“trusaic payparity”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- trusaic.com shared with Trusaic's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,187 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,850 · 76 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 994
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 73 in pay equity
Segment leader
12%
Syndio
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 112 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 110 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Trusaic PayParity
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trusaic PayParity; a claim can dispute any of them.
Trusaic 17Trusaic (PayParity) 3PayParity 2PayParity (Trusaic) 1
Follow Trusaic PayParity
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Trusaic is the company behind Trusaic PayParity.ShowHide
The company
Trusaic is the company behind Trusaic PayParity.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Advanced Pay Equity Software
- For
- enterprises
- Integrations claimed
- 4 trusaic.com/payparity
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 2Fair Pay Innovation Lab
- Customers named
- Alaska Airlines
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Trusaic PayParity's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trusaic.com/payparity, trusaic.com/salary-range-finder, trusaic.com/resources/pay-equity, trusaic.com/payparity/schedule-a-demo, trusaic.com/salary-range-finder/schedule-a-demo. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trusaic PayParity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trusaic PayParity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trusaic PayParity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trusaic PayParity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trusaic PayParity, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.