Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 11 of 71
3 categories · RankedFigures
75Judge labels
6First choices
3Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Pay equity for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Figures →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 78
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 73
7%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise12 of 68
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
In pay equity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Figures for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 7% | 5 of 73 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 2% | 17 of 140 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 20 of 148 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Figures held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Pay equity · by segment
Mid-market▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 27 → 6 of 67
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 → 12 of 60
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | 0% | 7% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 5 of 73 |
| Compensation management | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 17 of 140 |
| Compensation benchmarkin | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 of 148, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Figures across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Figures across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels4
Comparative15 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained15 labels2
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If EU-based or global: Figures offers the best balance of compliance features and usability for mid-market” Kimi K2 · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Figures or Syndio as they balance functionality with mid-market accessibility” MiniMax M2.5 · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms like Comprehensive, Figures.hr, Salary.com CompAnalyst, Paycom, or Ravio” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compensation management · scale prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Figures HR (if EU/UK focus) or Syndio (if global/US focus)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Tools requiring heavy analyst intervention (e.g., certain configurations of Aeqium, Figures)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Figures, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Figures was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Figures, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Figures was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Figures. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 73 of the 75 answers that named Figures and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
figures.hrYour site46
peoplemanagingpeople.com40
ravio.com40
g2.com26
comprehensive.io24
guideflow.com22
effy.ai21
pin.com20
captivateiq.com19
deel.com19
231 of the 277 domain citations in answers naming Figures came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
figures.hr is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Figures takes 7% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
figures.hr is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Figures takes 7% of first choices and Syndio takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “pay equity tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “pay equity analysis software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90,500 a month (“figures”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 269,511 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,710 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,363 · 61 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,104
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 5 of 73 in pay equity
Segment leader
12%
Syndio
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 75 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 73 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on figures.hr
837
subdomains included
Content
379
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
7 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 319 | undated | Pay equity, Compensation management | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 11 | undated | HRIS and HCM platforms, Pay equity | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | undated | Compensation management | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | Pay equity |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page figures.hr exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Figures
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Figures; a claim can dispute any of them.
Figures.hr 3Figures HR 1
Follow Figures
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Figures is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Figures is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Pay Transparency and Compensation Management Software
- For
- HR and managers
- Price stated
- 0 EUR figures.hr
- Starting price
- 0 figures.hr
- Free plan or trial
- Get an app preview figures.hr/solutions/benchmark
- Integrations claimed
- 30 figures.hr
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001GDPR complianceGDPR-compliant
- Hosting
- European cloud storage
- Customers named
- QontoCryptioPhitureDoctolibOUTFITTERYready2orderLenusStation F
What Figures's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: figures.hr, figures.hr/pricing, trust.figures.hr, figures.hr/solutions/benchmark, figures.hr/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Figures's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Figures, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Figures by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Figures is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Figures, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.