| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | Compensation and total rewards | 4% | 13 of 73 | 45% | 20 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay equity | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 13 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with beqom PaySuite if you want an all-in-one solution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pay equity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“PayAnalytics/beqom is the most commonly cited accessible choice” Muse Glimmer 30B · Pay equity · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose beqom / PayAnalytics if you want a platform that is more explicit about its statistical approach and pricing structure.” Perplexity Sonar · Pay equity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Beqom uses advanced analytics and AI to detect pay gaps and inequities across the workforce” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pay equity · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise statistical audit giants (e.g., Syndio, Beqom, Trusaic) are highly robust but typically require custom enterprise contracts and significant implementation effort.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pay equity · negative prompt · soft negative
“suggests a broader enterprise-leaning suite rather than a narrowly focused mid-market pay-equity tool” Perplexity Sonar · Pay equity · direct prompt · soft negative
“"When to Avoid Enterprise Tools (Like Syndio or Beqom) … usually overkill and cost-prohibitive"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Pay equity · negative prompt · soft negative
“beqom is frequently cited as an enterprise tool that's often overkill for smaller teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pay equity · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 74 answers that named beqom Pay Equity and are not a share of its labels.
338 of the 338 domain citations in answers naming beqom Pay Equity came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 223 | 5 | 2026-09-11 | Pay equity, Performance management | |
| News or press | 44 | 7 | 2026-09-07 | Pay equity, Compensation management | |
| Case study | 20 | 19 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 20 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | Pay equity | |
| Conference or event | 7 | 6 | 2026-11-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2024-11-05 | Compensation management | |
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2024-10-01 | HRIS and HCM platforms | |
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-05 |
As the event pages on beqom.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page beqom.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What beqom Pay Equity's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: beqom.com, beqom.com/products/beqom-ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when beqom Pay Equity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as beqom Pay Equity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for beqom Pay Equity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: