Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 15 of 58
1 category · Named, not rankedSugarOKR
11Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SugarOKR was named 4 times in Goals and OKRs, where Perdoo led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 63
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 68
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise47 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In goals and okrs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SugarOKR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 2% | 11 of 68 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Perdoo at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SugarOKR held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Goals and OKRs · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 12 of 62
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 42 of 54, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals and OKRs | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 11 of 68 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SugarOKR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SugarOKR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have 0 budget and unlimited users: Use SugarOKR or Google Sheets.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · first choice
“SugarOKR is one of the simplest free OKR tools available, built specifically for small teams or solo founders.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative
“best if you want a free, unlimited lightweight option and can accept a simpler product” Perplexity Sonar · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SugarOKR, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SugarOKR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SugarOKR, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SugarOKR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SugarOKR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named SugarOKR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
okrstool.com11
mooncamp.com10
tability.io10
ones.com7
firsthr.app6
resources.rework.com5
perdoo.com4
worxmate.ai4
peoplemanager.net3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming SugarOKR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sugarokr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SugarOKR takes 2% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sugarokr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SugarOKR takes 2% of first choices and Perdoo takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “okr tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “okr software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“sugarokr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 66 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 42 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 210
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 68 in goals and okrs
Segment leader
24%
Perdoo
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sugarokr.com
29
subdomains included
Content
14
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2026-05-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-07-14Fair performance reviews blog
- 2026-06-23What is okr glossary or explainer
- 2026-05-17Lattice alternative comparison
- 2026-05-17Leapsome alternative comparison
- 2026-05-17Culture amp alternative comparison
- 2026-05-1715five alternative comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sugarokr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SugarOKR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SugarOKR is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SugarOKR is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Free OKR software for goal setting, tracking and management
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Free sugarokr.com
- Starting price
- Free sugarokr.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free forever; No credit card required sugarokr.com
- Customers named
- e27TwilioKai ChanFacebook
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What SugarOKR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sugarokr.com, sugarokr.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SugarOKR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SugarOKR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SugarOKR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SugarOKR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SugarOKR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.