Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 8 of 83
3 categories · RankedSoftr
22Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Internal communications for small business buyers
Rank 42 of 86 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 87
4%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market42 of 86
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Softr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications and intranet | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 42 of 86 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Teams at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| HR AI assistants | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 86 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MeBeBot at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 78 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Softr held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal communications · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 48 → 49 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal communications | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 42 of 86 |
| HR AI assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 86 of 142, unchanged |
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 78 of 95, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Softr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Softr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Softr lets you build a branded, custom intranet from scratch” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Building Custom HR Tools” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR AI assistants · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Softr, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Softr was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Softr, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Softr was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Softr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Softr and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
softr.ioYour site22
peoplemanagingpeople.com11
learn.g2.com10
g2.com9
simpplr.com8
workvivo.com8
firsthr.app6
guideflow.com6
oak.com6
staffbase.com6
Seventy of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming Softr came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
softr.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Softr takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.ShowHide
Search and answers
softr.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Softr takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Teams takes 14%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “employee intranet”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “intranet platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 368,000 a month (“softr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 279 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 146,476 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,348 · 443 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,040
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 42 of 86 in internal communications
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Teams
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 22 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on softr.io
10,002
subdomains included
Content
1,220
counted in the table below
Documentation
4,942
Product · Integration
58 · 186
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 440 | 7 | 2026-09-25 | Employee onboarding, Org charts | |
| Podcast or video | 216 | undated | Applicant tracking syste | ||
| Comparison | 185 | 6 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 145 | undated | Employee onboarding | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 75 | 2 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 63 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| Case study | 62 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| News or press | 18 | 0 | 2023-05-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2024-09-10 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2024-06-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Claude code pricing blog
- 2026-09-25What is database software glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-21Turn spreadsheet into app blog
- 2026-09-20Smartsheet pricing blog
- 2026-09-18Base44 vs bolt vs softr comparison
- 2026-09-16Build app claude code softr blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page softr.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Softr
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Softr is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Softr is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Build secure portals and internal tools, no developer required.
- For
- business operations
- Price stated
- On annual billing the monthly rates are Free $0, Basic $19, Pro $99, and Business $329. Softr has four self-serve plans plus custom Enterprise pricing. softr.io
- Starting price
- 0 softr.io
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free softr.io
- Integrations claimed
- 21 softr.io · 15 softr.io/pricing · 17 softr.io/solutions/hr pages disagree
- Certifications
- GDPR ReadySOC 2SOC 2 Type II compliantGDPRSOC 2 Type 2SOC2
- Hosting
- GermanyFrankfurt (Germany)BelgiumEUUS
- Customers named
- NetflixGoogleStripeUPSTorigen PharmaceuticalsMinerva NetworkCelonisUrban's Group
What Softr's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: softr.io, softr.io, softr.io/pricing, trust.softr.io, softr.io/solutions/hr. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Softr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Softr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Softr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Softr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Softr, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.