Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 22% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 22% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 2 of 69, unchanged
1 category · RankedLucidchart
175Judge labels
14First choices
65Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Org charts for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 95 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 39% of its 57 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Lucidchart →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 72
19%66 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market9 of 95
2%57 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise6 of 86
5%51 labels
criticized challenger
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lucidchart for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 9 of 95 | 39% | 57 | criticized challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lucidchart held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 9 of 90
Enterprise▼−1Since September 2026: 7% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 12 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 6% | 2% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 9 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lucidchart across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lucidchart across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct33 labels4
Paraphrase23 labels7
Comparative40 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels2
Scale-constrained16 labels1
Negative33 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative175 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Org Chart Software (like Lucidchart, OrgChart, or Miro) - Best for visualizing hierarchy, roles, and reporting relationships.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lucidchart is a strong all-around choice for org charts as part of a broader diagramming suite” Perplexity Sonar · Org charts · comparative prompt · first choice
“Lucidchart – well-rounded diagramming ... Diagram + collaboration beyond orgs: Lucidchart” Muse Glimmer 30B · Org charts · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want flexibility and multi-purpose diagramming, choose Lucidchart or Visio.” Mistral Small · Org charts · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Static diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, Visio, PowerPoint, Excel, and Word when they are used as the primary org-chart system” Perplexity Sonar · Org charts · negative prompt · hard negative
“static diagramming tools (like Lucidchart, Miro, or Visio) fail because manual updates quickly become a bottleneck” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · direct prompt · hard negative
“Lucidchart specifically — users note it's "expensive, locked behind seats, and overkill"” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · hard negative
“*Why avoid:* While they can import data, they are fundamentally static vector canvases.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · scale prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lucidchart, over the 172 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucidchart was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lucidchart, over the 172 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucidchart was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lucidchart. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 159 of the 172 answers that named Lucidchart and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
firsthr.app77
forbes.com75
onedirectory.com66
teamohana.com57
gitnux.org56
venngage.com56
g2.com52
theorgchart.com51
creately.com49
worldmetrics.org48
587 of the 587 domain citations in answers naming Lucidchart came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lucid.co ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lucidchart takes 2% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lucid.co ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lucidchart takes 2% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 74,000 a month (“lucidchart”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 878 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 684,398 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 44,410 · 5,288 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 20,919
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 49 clicks and $313 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 14 across its categories
- Named in
- 172 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 159 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lucid.co
10,011
subdomains included
Content
2,462
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
21 · 120
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,625 | 7 | 2026-09-24 | Pay equity, Succession planning | |
| Template or tool | 513 | 0 | 2026-02-04 | Succession planning | |
| Glossary or explainer | 88 | 2 | 2026-09-10 | Pay equity, Succession planning | |
| Comparison | 80 | 0 | 2026-03-18 | ||
| Case study | 64 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 56 | 0 | 2025-02-06 | ||
| Conference or event | 18 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 15 | undated | |||
| News or press | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Scaling ai playbook blog
- 2026-09-16Capabilities tech teams need from a visual collaboration solution blog
- 2026-09-15Security teams AI adoption blog
- 2026-09-10What is cloud sprawl glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-08Ai solutions for business challenges blog
- 2026-09-03The biggest signs and risks of collaboration tech sprawl blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lucid.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Lucidchart
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lucidchart; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite 1Lucidchart/Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite 1
Follow Lucidchart
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lucidchart is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lucidchart is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Intelligent diagramming
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Pricing lucid.co
- Free plan or trial
- Sign up free lucid.co
- Integrations claimed
- 100 lucid.co
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2GDPRCCPACSAFedRAMP ModerateTX-RAMPISO 27001FedRAMP Authorized
- Customers named
- GoogleGENBC UniversalDocusignPing IdentityTV 2 DANMARKWestern UnionFlybuys Australia Limited
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What Lucidchart's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lucid.co, trust.lucid.co, lucid.co/platform, lucid.co/customers, lucid.co/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lucidchart's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lucidchart, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lucidchart by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lucidchart is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lucidchart, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.