AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Skedulo · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Skedulo

12Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Skedulo was named 6 times in Frontline employee apps, where Connecteam led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skedulo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience2%8 of 1060%6under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 49%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Skedulo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Frontline employee apps · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 17 → 15 of 89
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 8 of 100, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 13 → 10 of 82

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Frontline employee apps2%2%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 of 106, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Skedulo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase10 labels2
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Skedulo - Best for enterprises and mid-market managing mobile or deskless workers” Llama 4 Maverick · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If your B2B needs lean heavily toward advanced field service (e.g., job dispatching), consider Skedulo as a close second.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Skedulo if your main need is field scheduling and dispatch” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you have field teams, Skedulo would be the best choice.” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skedulo, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skedulo was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Connecteam10 of 125Not among the top eight
MangoApps6 of 121Not among the top eight
Deputy5 of 121Not among the top eight
Beekeeper5 of 120Not among the top eight
Blink5 of 120Not among the top eight
Staffbase4 of 122Not among the top eight
When I Work3 of 120Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers2 of 121Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 with Viva2 of 121Not among the top eight
ADP WorkForce Software2 of 120Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skedulo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Skedulo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com12
mangoapps.com9
hr-ai-index.com7
g2.com6
joinblink.com6
arrivy.com5
joinhomebase.com4
workstream.us4
dupple.com3
f6s.com3

Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming Skedulo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

skedulo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Skedulo takes 2% of first choices and Connecteam takes 49%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “frontline apps”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “frontline employee communication app”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
880 a month (“skedulo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
15 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,160 a month
Searches its site ranks for
861 · 39 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,410
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
13 ads · 6 image, 6 text, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2026, as SKEDULO INC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 13 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 106 in frontline employee apps
Segment leader
49%
Connecteam
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
12 answers
Its own site cited
in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on skedulo.com
1,989
subdomains included
Content
712
counted in the table below
Documentation
57
Product · Integration
18 · 21
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog37602026-05-07Workforce scheduling, Contingent workforce man
Glossary or explainer12502026-05-07
Conference or event80undated
News or press40undated
Case study34undated
Webinar or virtual event30undated
Comparison10undatedWorkforce management sui
Podcast or video9undated
Template or tool5undated
Report or ebook3undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page skedulo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Skedulo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Skedulo is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Deskless Productivity and Mobile Workforce Management
For
any company in any industry
Price stated
Demo & pricing skedulo.com
Certifications
AWS Qualified SoftwareCCPAGDPRHIPAASOC 2
Customers named
BB ImagingHometreeConnexinSunrunSolace Pediatric Home HealthcareAmerican Red CrossThe John Moriarty FoundationIDSS
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Skedulo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: skedulo.com, skedulo.com/pricing, trust.skedulo.com, skedulo.com/platform, skedulo.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skedulo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skedulo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Skedulo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Skedulo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Skedulo, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skedulo.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.