AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Blackboard Learn · October 2026 Edition
Blackboard · 1 category · Ranked

Blackboard Learn

30Judge labels
0First choices
18Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Learning management syst for mid-market buyers
Rank 60 of 61 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Blackboard Learn →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Blackboard Learn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Learning management systemsLearning and development0%60 of 6150%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Blackboard Learn held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Learning management syst · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 58 → 48 of 50
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 74 → 55 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 57 → 64 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Learning management syst0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 74 → 60 of 61

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Blackboard Learn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00022
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K200022
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B01012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative16 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“While it once had a reputation for being clunky, its modern Blackboard Ultra interface has caught up with Canvas.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“A long-established higher-ed option, with institution-focused tools and integrations.” GPT-6 Luna · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Long-standing leader in academia (~18% U.S. higher-ed share)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Blackboard for legacy institutional depth.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Long-standing reliability issues... "atrocious" help desk experiences... an "80's platform trying to meet the needs of this century"” Kimi K2 · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Blackboard Original, Blackbaud LMS, and self-hosted Moodle” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms with Consistent User & Technical Complaints ### Blackboard Learn” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if modern UI/support matters” Grok 4.1 Fast · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Blackboard Learn, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blackboard Learn was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Moodle26 of 300Not among the top eight
Canvas LMS21 of 302Not among the top eight
Docebo19 of 302Not among the top eight
TalentLMS17 of 300Not among the top eight
Cornerstone OnDemand16 of 302Not among the top eight
D2L Brightspace16 of 302Not among the top eight
Absorb LMS14 of 300Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors Learning11 of 300Not among the top eight
SAP Litmos7 of 300Not among the top eight
LearnUpon6 of 300Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Blackboard Learn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 30 answers that named Blackboard Learn and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

blackboard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Blackboard Learn takes 0% of first choices and TalentLMS takes 51%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “lms for employee training”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “learning management systems”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“blackboard learn”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
173 a month
Its company's site
blackboard.com shared with Blackboard's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 1,253,959 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,294 · 3,132 in the top three
Sites linking to it
20,769
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
11 ads · 11 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as Blackboard, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 4 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 60 of 61 in learning management syst
Segment leader
51%
TalentLMS
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
30 answers
Its own site cited
in 26 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Blackboard Learn

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Blackboard Learn; a claim can dispute any of them.
Blackboard 3Blackboard Learn (by Anthology) 2Blackboard Learn (now Anthology) 1Blackboard Learn (now part of Anthology) 1Blackboard Learn / Anthology 1Blackboard Learn by Anthology 1

Follow Blackboard Learn

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Blackboard is the company behind Blackboard Learn.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The LMS for easier teaching and better learning; outpacing the market to deliver engaging, insightful, and personalized learning experiences.
Certifications
StateRAMP Moderate authorizationFedRAMP ModerateDISA’s IL4
Hosting
AWS GovCloud
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers

What Blackboard Learn's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: blackboard.com/material/blackboard-lms, blackboard.com/material/blackboard-lms-course-catalog, blackboard.com/material/blackboard-learn-for-business-overview, blackboard.com/material/blackboard-learn-stateramp-authorization-guide, blackboard.com/material/blackboard-learn-saas-deployment-on-aws-govcloud. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blackboard Learn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blackboard Learn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Blackboard Learn by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Blackboard Learn is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Blackboard Learn, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at blackboard.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.