Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 59 → 46 of 50
Workday · 3 categories · RankedWorkday Learning
36Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Learning management syst for enterprise buyers
Rank 58 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 67% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business47 of 52
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market58 of 61
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise14 of 72
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 58 of 61 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 51% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 74 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 0% | 59 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by 360Learning at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday Learning held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Learning management syst · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 53 of 55, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 16 → 15 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning management syst | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 61, unchanged |
| Compliance training | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 92, unchanged |
| Learning experience plat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 76 → 59 of 89 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Part of the top 5 corporate LMS vendors” Muse Glimmer 30B · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you want to avoid ... monolithic enterprise systems (like SAP SuccessFactors or Workday Learning, which are expensive and heavily administrative)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · scale prompt · hard negative
“beware of HR-suite-bundled LMSs if you care about actual learning outcomes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Learning, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Learning was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Learning, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Learning was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 36 answers that named Workday Learning and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
docebo.com14
goskills.com11
g2.com9
360learning.com8
ispring.com8
talentlms.com8
trupeer.ai8
capterra.com7
cornerstoneondemand.com7
forbes.com7
Eighty-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Workday Learning came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Workday Learning stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Workday Learning stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“workday learning”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 285 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 58 of 61 in learning management syst
Segment leader
51%
TalentLMS
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 36 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Workday Learning
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Learning; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday 1
Follow Workday Learning
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Learning.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Learning.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- workplace learning
- For
- UK telecom company TalkTalk
- Customers named
- TalkTalk Telecom GroupEcolabMcKee Foods
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workday Learning's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/en-ca/pages/talktalk-sparks-workplace-learning-with-workday.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/talent-management/learning.html, workday.com/pl-pl/customer-stories/a-h/ecolab-transforms-onboarding-learning-workday-extend.html, workday.com/en-us/customer-stories/a-h/ecolab-transforms-onboarding-learning-workday-extend.html, workday.com/en-gb/customer-stories/i-p/mobile-app-empowers-frontline-workers-to-learn-on-the-road.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Learning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday Learning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Learning, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.