Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsNot ranked
3 categories · Named, not rankedReplicon
17Judge labels
4First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Replicon was named 6 times in Leave and 2 other categories, where BambooHR led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market94 of 95
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 98
4%4 labels
under the label threshold
In leave · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Replicon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 94 of 95 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 32 of 78 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 46 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clockify at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Replicon held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Leave · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 54 → 90 of 91
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 11 → 5 of 89
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leave | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 54 → 94 of 95 |
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 78, unchanged |
| Time and attendance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 46 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Replicon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Replicon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels4
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Go with Replicon if your revenue model depends on accurately billing client hours.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative
“### 3. Best for Field Service/Compliance: Replicon” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Mixed reviews from users ... Verdict: Decent overall but limited for detailed reporting needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Leave · negative prompt · hard negative
“more geared toward payroll and time tracking... translate to leave management only in a roundabout way” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Replicon, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Replicon was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Replicon, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Replicon was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Replicon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 17 answers that named Replicon and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com6
deltek.comYour site4
employsome.com4
forbes.com4
vacationtracker.io4
apps365.com3
g2.com3
jibble.io3
leapsome.com3
worldmetrics.org3
Thirty-three of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Replicon came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
deltek.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Replicon takes 0% of first choices and BambooHR takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
deltek.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Replicon takes 0% of first choices and BambooHR takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “leave management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “leave management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“replicon”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 128 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 225,755 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 22,440 · 1,647 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,222
- Paid Google search
- 6 searches its ads show for, about 58 clicks and $763 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 94 of 95 in leave
Segment leader
28%
BambooHR
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on deltek.com
1,878
subdomains included
Content
1,557
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
79 · 42
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,067 | 30 | 2026-09-28 | Performance management, Workforce planning | |
| Case study | 235 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| News or press | 161 | 3 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 48 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Comparison | 24 | 0 | 2026-03-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 1 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2025-08-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 3 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2021-04-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Q3 deltek propricer customer town hall conference or event
- 2026-09-28Apem case study
- 2026-09-28How to choose erp blog
- 2026-09-28Erp software for engineering firms blog
- 2026-09-25Kpis for architects blog
- 2026-09-22Ac8ff117 6780 416a 8e99 7b8888eb3a06 webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page deltek.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Replicon
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Replicon; a claim can dispute any of them.
Replicon (TimeOff module) 1
Follow Replicon
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Replicon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Replicon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Replicon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Replicon is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Replicon, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.