Workable vs Pinpoint
Zero of fourteen models named Workable first on the direct prompt; one named Pinpoint. Workable was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Pinpoint by ten and Workable carries 37 labels and Pinpoint 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the applicant tracking systems page.
By framing
WorkableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPinpoint
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Workable Pinpoint first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workable on the left and Pinpoint on the right.The direct prompt
Pinpoint first, Workable not the choice
1 of 14 modelsWorkable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Workable16%#3 of 11Pinpoint0%#– of 11Workable4%#– of 9Pinpoint4%#5 of 9What the models said about Workable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Considerations: Higher entry price; per‑seat or tiered pricing as you scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“costs a fraction of enterprise tools like Workable or Greenhouse” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Workable is a top mid-market choice for teams that need full ATS functionality without enterprise complexity, starting at $299/month flat.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd lean toward Workable as a strong starting point due to its transparent pricing, fast implementation, and robust AI features” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Pinpoint
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Pinpoint: Known for its flexibility and mid-market/enterprise focus.” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice
“Greenhouse and Pinpoint are top choices” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.