Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 59 → 66 of 71
Oracle · 1 category · Named, not rankedOracle Workforce Management
14Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Workforce Management was named 4 times in Workforce management sui, where Rippling led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business71 of 76
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 78
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 81
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Workforce Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 25 of 78 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Workforce Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Workforce management sui · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 44 → 40 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 21 → 16 of 70
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce management sui | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 44 → 25 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Workforce Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Workforce Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Often ranked at or near the top by firms like ISG for its deep integration capabilities.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · first choice
“Ranked highly for mid-market, offers robust scheduling and core HR capabilities together.” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce management sui · direct prompt · alternative
“A logical contender for Oracle HCM users” GPT-6 Luna · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“high cost, steep learning curve, and limited flexibility for smaller deployments” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Workforce Management, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Workforce Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Workforce Management, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Workforce Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Workforce Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Oracle Workforce Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ukg.com6
g2.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
adp.com4
assembled.com4
oracle.comYour site4
sap.com4
workforce.com4
dayforce.com3
docs.oracle.comYour site3
Thirty-five of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Oracle Workforce Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Oracle Workforce Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Oracle Workforce Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“oracle workforce management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 78 in workforce management sui
Segment leader
17%
Rippling
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle Workforce Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Workforce Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Management 2Oracle HCM / Workforce Management 1Oracle Workforce Scheduling 1
Follow Oracle Workforce Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Workforce Management.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Workforce Management.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Oracle
- Oracle ASCP, Oracle Cloud EPM, Oracle Compensation, Oracle EBS, Oracle E‑Business Suite, Oracle Fusion, Oracle Fusion Agentic Applications, Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- An AI-driven solution that streamlines workforce tasks and optimizes labor costs.
- For
- HR, business, and operations leaders
- Free plan or trial
- 注册 Oracle Cloud 免费套餐 oracle.com/cn/human-capital-management/workforce-management
- Customers named
- American Furniture WarehouseBaylor UniversityJungbunzlauerOSU Medical CenterArqivaEquity Residential
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Oracle Workforce Management's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: oracle.com/ae/human-capital-management/workforce-management, oracle.com/br/human-capital-management/workforce-management, oracle.com/bz/human-capital-management/workforce-management, oracle.com/cn/human-capital-management/workforce-management, oracle.com/de/human-capital-management/workforce-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Workforce Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Workforce Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Workforce Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Workforce Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Workforce Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.