Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 124 → 93 of 100
Oracle · 1 category · RankedOracle Fusion Cloud Compensation
31Judge labels
3First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Compensation management for enterprise buyers
Rank 28 of 140 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business100 of 108
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 140
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 126
5%20 labels
accepted challenger
In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 28 of 140 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Compensation management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 161 → 31 of 131
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 10 of 109
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 161 → 28 of 140 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative11 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Positioned as a leader in compensation management, especially for large enterprises with complex needs.” Mistral Small · Compensation management · comparative prompt · first choice
“For enterprise all-in-one HCM: Workday, Oracle, or SAP” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Large organizations using Oracle Cloud HCM” GPT-6 Luna · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Large orgs (e.g., Oracle #1 per ISG)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Major, recurring security breaches by the extortion group ShinyHunters targeting payroll and employee records” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 31 answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ravio.com17
comprehensive.io13
captivateiq.com11
figures.hr10
learn.g2.com10
peoplemanagingpeople.com9
darwinbox.com7
firsthr.app6
gartner.com6
guideflow.com6
Ninety-five of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“oracle fusion cloud compensation”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 140 in compensation management
Segment leader
18%
Pave
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 31 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle 3Oracle (PeopleSoft) 1Oracle Compensation 1Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM 1Oracle HCM 1Oracle HCM Cloud 1Oracle HCM Compensation 1
Follow Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Oracle
- Oracle ASCP, Oracle Cloud EPM, Oracle Compensation, Oracle EBS, Oracle E‑Business Suite, Oracle Fusion, Oracle Fusion Agentic Applications, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Customers named
- CognizantAllegis GroupCognizan
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/cloud/rewards, oracle.com/cloud/rewards/faq, oracle.com/apac/cloud/rewards, oracle.com/asean/cloud/rewards, oracle.com/latam/cloud/rewards. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.