AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Nakisa Org Design Suite · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Nakisa Org Design Suite

25Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Org charts for enterprise buyers
Rank 35 of 95 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nakisa Org Design Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Org charts and org designWorkforce planning and analytics0%35 of 9533%3under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Nakisa Org Design Suite held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Org charts · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 68 → 56 of 69
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 19 → 33 of 90
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 → 7 of 80

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Org charts0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 19 → 35 of 95

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Nakisa Org Design Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“consider HR-based tools like ChartHop, Orgvue, or Nakisa” Mistral Small · Org charts · negative prompt · first choice
“Ingentis org.manager, Orgvue, Nakisa, or Workday/SAP native modules” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Better suited for larger enterprises (5,000+ employees)... without the enterprise complexity and cost of tools like Nakisa” Kimi K2 · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nakisa Org Design Suite, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nakisa Org Design Suite was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ChartHop22 of 251Not among the top eight
Orgvue17 of 253Not among the top eight
OrgChart16 of 255Not among the top eight
Ingentis org.manager16 of 253Not among the top eight
OneDirectory13 of 252Not among the top eight
Microsoft Visio13 of 250Not among the top eight
Lucidchart12 of 250Not among the top eight
Pingboard9 of 251Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors7 of 250Not among the top eight
Workday7 of 250Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nakisa Org Design Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Nakisa Org Design Suite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

onedirectory.com20
theorgchart.com17
g2.com11
gitnux.org11
creately.com9
teamohana.com9
worldmetrics.org9
nakisa.comYour site8
venngage.com8
forbes.com7

101 of the 109 domain citations in answers naming Nakisa Org Design Suite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

nakisa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nakisa Org Design Suite takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“nakisa org design suite”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,231 a month
Searches its site ranks for
543 · 67 in the top three
Sites linking to it
642
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
36 ads · 28 text, 8 image · 7 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as Nakisa inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 15 in the year, 21 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 35 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
25 answers
Its own site cited
in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on nakisa.com
717
subdomains included
Content
527
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
16 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog28202026-05-25Workforce planning, Org charts
News or press16852026-09-24Workforce planning, People analytics
Case study3902025-05-09
Webinar or virtual event1522026-09-18Workforce planning
Comparison13undated
Conference or event5undated
Template or tool202023-06-22
Glossary or explainer2undated
Report or ebook1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page nakisa.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name workforce planning (20); 5 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Nakisa Org Design Suite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nakisa Org Design Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nakisa 3

Follow Nakisa Org Design Suite

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Nakisa Org Design Suite is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Design your optimal future structure with advanced org scenario modeling.
For
the world’s largest organizations
Free plan or trial
Get a free demo nakisa.com/platform-technology
Integrations claimed
45 nakisa.com/platform-technology
Certifications
SOCISOCCCS Protected B
Hosting
CanadaGermanySingaporethe UAEthe USA
Customers named
AIBCOTYOPGJBS USAAmer SportNU SkinUnicomer GroupNestlé
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price

What Nakisa Org Design Suite's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: nakisa.com, nakisa.com/tag/security, nakisa.com/platform-technology, nakisa.com/case-studies, nakisa.com/tag/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nakisa Org Design Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nakisa Org Design Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nakisa Org Design Suite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Nakisa Org Design Suite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nakisa Org Design Suite, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nakisa.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.