Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 69 → 64 of 69
Ingentis · 2 categories · RankedIngentis org.manager
52Judge labels
7First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Org charts for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 95 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business66 of 72
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 95
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 86
12%39 labels
accepted challenger
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Ingentis org.manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 20 of 95 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 72 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Ingentis org.manager held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 14 → 19 of 90
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 20 of 95 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 93, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Ingentis org.manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Ingentis org.manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels7
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative13 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative12 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Large enterprise (1000+ employees) | Ingentis org.manager, Orgvue, Nakisa, or Workday/SAP native modules” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · alternative
“If you need more advanced HR/IT controls, consider Ingentis org.manager” Mistral Small · Org charts · direct prompt · alternative
“The best org chart tools (like ChartHop, OneDirectory, Orgvue, or Ingentis)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · negative prompt · alternative
“Enterprise-grade security, multi-entity, automation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ingentis org.manager, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ingentis org.manager was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ingentis org.manager, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ingentis org.manager was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ingentis org.manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 52 answers that named Ingentis org.manager and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onedirectory.com35
theorgchart.com27
g2.com22
forbes.com21
gitnux.org21
teamohana.com19
venngage.com18
worldmetrics.org18
guideflow.com17
zapier.com15
213 of the 213 domain citations in answers naming Ingentis org.manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ingentis.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ingentis org.manager takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ingentis.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ingentis org.manager takes 0% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“ingentis org.manager”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- ingentis.com shared with Ingentis's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,481 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,939 · 247 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 633
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 52 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 52 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Ingentis org.manager
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ingentis org.manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Ingentis 2
Follow Ingentis org.manager
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ingentis is the company behind Ingentis org.manager.ShowHide
The company
Ingentis is the company behind Ingentis org.manager.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- org.manager-Community in vier Regionen
- For
- Menschen aus HR, Organisationsentwicklung und Business
- Customers named
- Verlagsgesellschaft Madsack GmbH & Co. KGSAP SEMVV Energie AGHochland GroupSAPVersicherungskammer BayernNBCUniversalVolkswagen AG
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Ingentis org.manager's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ingentis.com/de/lp-ingentis-solution-days-2026, ingentis.com/en/platform/rtr, ingentis.com/de/kunden/ingentis-kunden, ingentis.com/en/about-us/about-ingentis, ingentis.com/de/ueber-uns/ueber-ingentis. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ingentis org.manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ingentis org.manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ingentis org.manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ingentis org.manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ingentis org.manager, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.