Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 50 → 33 of 69
1 category · RankedOneDirectory
43Judge labels
9First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Org charts for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 95 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OneDirectory →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business35 of 72
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 95
6%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 86
10%30 labels
accepted challenger
In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OneDirectory for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | Workforce planning and analytics | 6% | 7 of 95 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, OneDirectory held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Org charts · by segment
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 90
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 → 4 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts | 12% | 7% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 7 of 95 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OneDirectory across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OneDirectory across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative9 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels5
Scale-constrained6 labels2
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“OneDirectory is the best org chart software for mid-size and large organizations with complex structures” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Org charts · direct prompt · first choice
“OneDirectory | Live HRIS sync, matrix reporting, governance. Built for mid-large orgs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice
“OneDirectory is recommended for mid-size and large organizations with such needs.” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · scale prompt · first choice
“Auto-updating live org chart | OneDirectory, ChartHop, or BambooHR's built-in feature” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“OneDirectory: Requires Microsoft 365 as the primary data source, lighter on workforce-planning and scenario-modeling depth.” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneDirectory, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneDirectory was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OneDirectory, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneDirectory was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneDirectory. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 43 answers that named OneDirectory and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onedirectory.comYour site41
theorgchart.com24
teamohana.com19
venngage.com17
forbes.com16
gitnux.org15
worldmetrics.org15
firsthr.app14
g2.com13
guideflow.com13
146 of the 187 domain citations in answers naming OneDirectory came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
onedirectory.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OneDirectory takes 6% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
onedirectory.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OneDirectory takes 6% of first choices and ChartHop takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “org chart tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “org chart software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“onedirectory”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,468 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,154 · 16 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 467
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 7 of 95 in org charts
Segment leader
30%
ChartHop
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 43 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 43 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on onedirectory.com
403
subdomains included
Content
208
counted in the table below
Documentation
130
Product · Integration
15 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 190 | 10 | 2026-09-22 | Org charts | |
| Comparison | 9 | 2 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Microsoft entra connect blog
- 2026-09-21Bpm improves firmwide employee visibility with onedirectory blog
- 2026-09-21Employee database vs employee directory comparison
- 2026-09-2115648686 customize before you launch pre launch checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-31Onedirectory august updates blog
- 2026-08-31Onedirectory g2 badges fall 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page onedirectory.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as OneDirectory
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OneDirectory; a claim can dispute any of them.
OneDirectory / Beyond Intranet (SharePoint Org Chart) 1
Follow OneDirectory
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OneDirectory is its own company.ShowHide
The company
OneDirectory is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The org chart and employee directory for Microsoft 365.
- For
- mid-sized and large organizations
- Price stated
- Pro pricing is based on your company size. Choose the employee profile band that fits your organization today, and move to a higher band as your company grows. Enterprise is custom-priced for larger or more complex organizations with additional rollout, procurement, compliance, or customization needs. onedirectory.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 349 onedirectory.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial onedirectory.com
- Hosting
- EUAU
- Customers named
- Samsung Research AmericaB&D IndustrialMountain View HospitalCitizens Alliance BankBankSouthChesapeake BankBPMDP Clinical
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications
What OneDirectory's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onedirectory.com, onedirectory.com/pricing, trust.onedirectory.com, onedirectory.com/solutions/banks, onedirectory.com/blog/tag/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneDirectory's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneDirectory, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneDirectory by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OneDirectory is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OneDirectory, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.